The ISIS Wars: Kobani, Mosul, Raqqa
U.S. air and SOF enable Kurdish and Iraqi partners. Kobani holds; Mosul and Raqqa fall after grinding urban combat. JTACs, intel fusion, and drones guide strikes. Sinjar's rescue and Yazidi survivors spotlight stakes and scars.
Episode Narrative
The ISIS Wars: Kobani, Mosul, Raqqa
In the early years of the 21st century, a storm was brewing in the Middle East, one that would dramatically reshape the landscape of conflict and coalition warfare. Beginning in 2014, the United States led a coalition that would engage in a fierce battle against the extremist group known as ISIS, or the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria. This struggle extended across the borders of Iraq and Syria, involving complex alliances and bitter confrontations. The stakes were monumental: not only were they battling an insurgency that threatened millions, but they were also grappling with the human cost of war and the displacement of entire populations.
At the center of this tumult was Kobani, a Kurdish city in northern Syria, which became a focal point for resistance against ISIS. The battle for Kobani, spanning from 2014 to early 2015, would become symbolic not just for the Kurdish forces but for the U.S. commitment to halt ISIS's expansion. The city found itself encircled, with daily life fraught by fear and violence. Civilians were forced to flee, while brave defenders — comprised mainly of Kurdish fighters from the YPG — held the line. Reinforced by U.S. air support, they engaged in relentless street-to-street combat, launching a counteroffensive with the hopes of reclaiming their homeland.
As the airstrikes rained down from U.S. aircraft, they provided a vital edge to the Kurdish forces. This aerial assistance was born from intelligence sharing and tactical support, orchestrated by Joint Terminal Attack Controllers coordinating the mission on the ground. Their presence empowered the Kurdish fighters, allowing them to adapt and innovate in their defense against an enemy that was ruthlessly effective. The resilience displayed in Kobani marked a turning point in the campaign against ISIS, demonstrating that even against overwhelming odds, hope could prevail.
Fast forward to October of 2016, as the Battle of Mosul unfolded, a different yet equally intense theater of war emerged. The city had fallen under ISIS control in 2014, transforming into a grim stronghold where horrors unfolded daily. The liberation of Mosul would require an unyielding alliance of Iraqi Security Forces, Kurdish Peshmerga, and U.S.-led coalition support. Fighting through the heart of the city, this operation was characterized by complex urban combat, where streets became battlegrounds and civilians remained trapped in the crossfire.
Over the course of nine months, the streets echoed with the sounds of conflict — the crack of gunfire, the dull thuds of explosions, and the cries of those caught in the chaos. U.S. advisors on the ground played a crucial role, continuing the pattern initiated in Kobani, employing precision airstrikes that targeted ISIS's command and control capabilities. The evolution of tactics was imperative; the insurgents had dug tunnels, planted booby traps, and utilized human shields to protect their positions. Urban warfare had escalated to a new level of complexity, necessitating a precise and coordinated response.
As the brutal fighting drew on, the air support remained relentless. Each day, the coalition forces would gather intelligence — drones soaring above the densely populated neighborhoods, gathering real-time information crucial for the ground troops. The U.S. Joint Terminal Attack Controllers would meticulously coordinate airstrikes, ensuring that each drop of ordnance struck only enemy positions, minimizing civilian casualties as best as they could amidst the pandemonium. By July 2017, the city fell back into the hands of its people, marking a historic victory over ISIS. Yet, this was just one battle in a broader war.
Simultaneously, the humanitarian stakes had reached dire proportions. The plight of minority groups, particularly the Yazidis, became a stark reminder of the conflict’s human cost. In August of 2014, thousands found themselves trapped on Mount Sinjar, their only refuge against a looming genocide. The urgency of their situation prompted U.S. airstrikes and special operations to facilitate their evacuation. This mission not only saved lives but drew global attention to the horrors that ISIS was inflicting on vulnerable populations.
Following the liberation of Mosul, attention turned to Raqqa, the de facto capital of ISIS in Syria. In 2017, the Syrian Democratic Forces led the charge, backed once again by U.S. air power and special operations. The campaign to retake Raqqa featured the same blend of real-time intelligence and relentless support that characterized Mosul. A similar cadence of urban combat unfolded — every inch of the city had to be contested. As coalition forces engaged ISIS, they carefully integrated tactics designed to minimize civilian harm, illustrating both the horrors of battle and the complexities of modern warfare.
Amidst the sieges and airstrikes lay a fundamental question: what would emerge from this conflict? The ISIS Wars revealed the evolution of military strategy and cooperation across borders. The U.S. military, adapting to the unique challenges of urban warfare and multilateral operations, not only drew on its own lessons from previous conflicts but also paved the way for future operations. The ability to integrate air, ground, intelligence, and even cyber capabilities became a hallmark of engagement in these complex environments.
Yet with every act of bravery, each step taken to reclaim cities, the psychological and physical toll on the soldiers who fought was palpable. Studies documented significant rates of combat stress, traumatic brain injuries, and posttraumatic stress disorder among veterans. The scars of battle were borne not just by history's narratives but also deeply etched in the minds of those who served, each experience an echo of the larger conflict.
As the dust settled, the multi-domain operations established during the ISIS Wars emerged as templates for future interventions. The coalition’s successes, marred by losses and heartbreak, became teachable moments, informing doctrine and shaping military training for generations to come.
In retrospect, the ISIS Wars showcased the undeniable resilience of human spirit — both of the local populations fighting for their homes and of the soldiers who stood with them. As we look back on the trials faced in Kobani, Mosul, and Raqqa, we are reminded that while victory in war may come at a high price, the fight for justice and humanity is ceaseless.
These conflicts may have receded into a complex geopolitical narrative, but they still reverberate in the lives of countless individuals. Their legacies are reminders that the consequences of war reach far beyond the battlefield and checkered history books. The scars linger, the stories echo, and the questions remain: What does peace truly look like after such devastation? How do we mend the fabric of a broken society? And in the face of such darkness, what light can we hold on to?
Such reflections weave into the ongoing story of resilience and hope, urging us to remember, to learn, and to carry forward the lessons drawn from those who stood firm amidst the storm.
Highlights
- 2014-2019: The U.S. led a coalition conducting extensive airstrikes and Special Operations Forces (SOF) support to Kurdish and Iraqi ground partners against ISIS in Syria and Iraq. This included the defense of Kobani (2014-2015), a key battle where Kurdish forces, aided by U.S. air power and intelligence, repelled ISIS advances, marking a turning point in the campaign.
- 2016-2017: The Battle of Mosul was a major urban combat operation involving Iraqi Security Forces, Kurdish Peshmerga, and U.S.-led coalition support. The campaign lasted from October 2016 to July 2017, resulting in the liberation of Mosul from ISIS after months of grinding street-to-street fighting, with U.S. Joint Terminal Attack Controllers (JTACs) coordinating precision airstrikes and drones playing a critical role in intelligence fusion and targeting.
- 2017: The Raqqa campaign, led by the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) with U.S. air and SOF support, culminated in the capture of ISIS’s de facto capital in Syria. The operation showcased the integration of real-time intelligence, drone surveillance, and close air support to minimize civilian casualties in dense urban environments.
- 2014: The Sinjar rescue operation highlighted the humanitarian stakes of the ISIS conflict. U.S. airstrikes and SOF enabled the evacuation of thousands of Yazidi survivors trapped on Mount Sinjar, preventing a potential genocide and drawing global attention to the plight of minority groups under ISIS control.
- 2001-2021: Throughout the Afghanistan and Iraq wars, the U.S. military developed advanced combat casualty care systems, including rapid evacuation and trauma surgery, which significantly reduced mortality rates among wounded soldiers. These medical advances were critical in sustaining prolonged urban and asymmetric warfare.
- 2003-2025: The U.S. military’s use of drones and intelligence fusion centers evolved significantly, enabling precision targeting in complex urban battles against insurgents and terrorist groups, reducing collateral damage and improving operational effectiveness in Iraq and Syria.
- 2014-2025: U.S. Joint Terminal Attack Controllers (JTACs) became essential in coordinating airstrikes in close proximity to friendly forces and civilians, especially in urban combat zones like Mosul and Raqqa, enhancing the precision and effectiveness of coalition air power.
- 2014-2019: The U.S. military’s partnership with Kurdish forces (YPG/YPJ) in Syria was controversial but effective in degrading ISIS capabilities. This alliance involved training, equipping, and advising Kurdish fighters, who bore the brunt of ground combat in northern Syria.
- 2014-2025: The ISIS conflict underscored the importance of multi-domain operations, integrating air, ground, intelligence, and cyber capabilities. The U.S. military’s adaptation to these complex operations set precedents for future conflicts involving urban warfare and counterterrorism.
- 2014-2017: The coalition’s air campaign against ISIS included thousands of precision strikes, guided by real-time intelligence from drones and human sources, which systematically dismantled ISIS’s command and control, logistics, and heavy weapons.
Sources
- https://eapk.com.ua/en/journals/tom-32-4-2025/otsinka-vplivu-vtrat-agropromislovogo-kompleksu-ukrayini-vnaslidok-viyskovikh-diy-na-riven-yiyi-natsionalnoyi-bezpeki-2014-2025
- https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/fullarticle/2839141
- https://sitjournal.com/sitj/article/view/69
- https://ojspustek.org/index.php/SJR/article/view/1079
- https://www.infezmed.it/media/journal/Vol_33_1_2025_15.pdf
- http://efp.in.ua/en/journal-article/1685
- https://intern.bulletin.knu.ua/article/view/3573
- https://academia.edu.pk/index.php/Journals/article/view/254
- https://militaryhealth.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmjmilitary-2025-NATO.21
- https://militaryhealth.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmjmilitary-2025-NATO.19