America First: Order Unmade
Tariffs hit allies and China; TPP is scrapped; the Paris pact and Iran deal are exited; the WTO court stalls. Allies hedge as the US tests how much order it still wants to lead.
Episode Narrative
The year is 1991, a pivotal moment in history, one that reverberates through the very fabric of global politics. The collapse of the Soviet Union signals the end of the Cold War, casting aside an era of bipolar tension that had defined the world for nearly half a century. As the iron curtain crumbles, a new landscape emerges. The United States stands alone, triumphant and unchallenged as the world’s sole superpower. This is a "unipolar moment," defined by American dominance in politics, economics, and military might. The backdrop to this monumental transformation is one of hope and trepidation, an awakening of the possible, but also a foreboding of the complexities that lie ahead.
In this new world order, the United States seizes the opportunity to expand its influence. NATO, once a bastion against the Soviet threat, now reaches eastward, incorporating former Warsaw Pact countries. This expansion is not merely a strategy of containment; it represents a profound shift in the balance of power. The Gulf War erupts in 1991, a definitive demonstration of American military prowess and an assertion of the country’s role as the preeminent global leader. The coalition forces, led by the United States, see victory not just as a military success, but as a precedent for American-led multilateralism. It is a high-stakes game of chess, with each move reflecting a desire to sculpt the world according to American ideals.
The exuberance of this unipolar moment, however, doesn't last. The events of September 11, 2001, turn the tide once more. The world awakens to a new reality as terrorists strike the heart of the United States in an audacious plan that changes everything. The aftermath of the attacks prompts a radical shift in U.S. foreign policy. The invasions of Afghanistan and later Iraq introduce prolonged conflicts that strain the limits of American resolve and resources, drawing the nation deeper into a web of protracted warfare. This era of intervention is framed as a fight against terrorism and an effort to bring democracy to troubled regions, yet it often raises more questions than answers about American leadership and moral clarity.
By 2008, the world faces a different kind of crisis. The global financial storm originates within the heart of the American economy, rooted in the housing market’s collapse. As the storm brews, it engulfs nations around the globe, triggering a scale of recession that shakes confidence in American economic hegemony. It is a moment where China’s fortunes begin to rise, clawing its way back from the shadows of previous decades, challenging the very foundations of a system that had long been defined by American principles.
In the following years, the U.S. continues its entanglements abroad. NATO interventions, such as the 2011 operation in Libya, promise humanitarian aid but lead to chaos instead. Questions arise regarding the efficacy of American-led military actions. Each intervention serves as a reminder that the outcomes often deviate dramatically from initial intentions. Meanwhile, the revelations of Edward Snowden in 2013 expose the extent of American surveillance programs, igniting international outrage and compromising trust between traditional allies.
Amidst these uncertainties, 2015 sees the signing of the Paris Climate Agreement — a collective commitment to address the pressing issue of climate change. Yet, within a couple of years, political shifts lead to America’s withdrawal from the agreement. This retreat symbolizes a broader disinclination to embrace multilateral leadership, illuminating the complicated relationship the United States has with its own role on the world stage.
Simultaneously, diplomatic engagements in the realm of nuclear agreements take a contrasting turn. The Iran nuclear deal, celebrated as a triumph of U.S. diplomacy, faces a different fate. The unanticipated exit from this meticulously crafted agreement in 2018 raises alarms among allies and diminishes the credibility of American commitments. Within the economic sphere, attempts to counter China’s rising influence manifest in the Trans-Pacific Partnership, a colossal trade deal that ultimately remains abandoned. This leaves a vacuum in Asia-Pacific governance, a testament to the shifting sands beneath American leadership.
As 2017 unfolds, the U.S. officially categorizes China as a “strategic competitor,” signifying a shift toward recognizing the limitations of unipolar dominance. Trade wars erupt as tariffs against allies and adversaries alike redefine relationships, bringing about a disruption of global supply chains that extends far beyond American borders. International institutions, particularly the World Trade Organization, find themselves in disarray, as the U.S. blocks new judges, paralyzing a system meant to facilitate cooperative trade. The liberal economic order, once deemed stable, faces profound challenges.
In the wake of these economic tremors, the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 lays bare the vulnerabilities in the American public health infrastructure. While the U.S. grapples with its response, China’s “mask diplomacy” presents a stark contrast — an assertive front that reshapes global narratives about leadership during a crisis. The potency of these actions alters perceptions, redefining the contours of power and influence on the world stage.
The chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021 provides a striking visual of an era closing — a twenty-year engagement dissolving in a matter of days. This fast-paced retreat symbolizes not only the end of a mission but fosters doubts about the reliability of American security guarantees. Allies observe closely, adapting to a new reality where dependence on U.S. fortifications appears less certain.
As the following years unfold, Russia's aggressive invasion of Ukraine in 2022 tests the very fabric of U.S. leadership. The Biden administration responds with substantial military aid to Ukraine, reaffirming commitment to the Western alliance. However, this conflict also accelerates European efforts to become less dependent on American security guarantees, further complicating the international landscape.
In 2023, despite maintaining the highest military spending in the world, perceived American supremacy faces mounting challenges. China embarks on an ambitious path of military modernization. Russia’s renewed assertiveness adds to the complexity. A sense of unease — not just about military capabilities but about the narrative of American exceptionalism — begins to take hold.
As we move further into the present, the geopolitical landscape continues to shift. A “chip war” emerges between the U.S. and China, with export controls on advanced semiconductors representing a new frontier in great power competition. This rising tension reflects a broader apprehension among allies, who begin to hedge their bets and deepen ties with China while investing in their own defense capabilities. This raises important questions about the future of American leadership, as uncertainty lingers over what tomorrow may bring.
In the cultural realm, the rise of social media and streaming platforms during this period amplifies American influence globally, yet it simultaneously facilitates the spread of anti-American sentiment and deepens domestic political polarization. This duality reflects the complexity of America’s role, both as a bastion of creativity and a source of contention.
The economic landscape, too, reflects a shifting balance. In 1991, the U.S. accounted for nearly a quarter of global GDP. By 2025, projections suggest this share may decline to about twenty percent, while China’s economic share rises significantly — a striking testament to the changing tides.
As we consider these monumental shifts, one must reflect deeply on what they entail. What does it mean for a superpower when the architecture of the global order begins to shift? Can America adapt to an increasingly multipolar world? The story of American leadership — once defined by unrivaled hegemony — has morphed into a tale marked by contestation, complexity, and uncertainty. The dawn of a new era arrives, filled with both promise and peril. In this unfolding narrative, the choices made today will inevitably shape the world of tomorrow. The myths of invincibility are challenged, and the mirror of history beckons each nation to examine its role in the unfolding drama of human existence.
Highlights
- 1991: The collapse of the Soviet Union marks the end of the Cold War, leaving the United States as the world’s sole superpower and ushering in a “unipolar moment” characterized by unchallenged American dominance in global politics, economics, and military affairs.
- 1991–2001: The U.S. leverages its superpower status to expand NATO eastward, intervenes in the Balkans (e.g., Kosovo, 1999), and leads international coalitions in the Gulf War (1991), setting precedents for American-led multilateralism.
- 2001: The 9/11 attacks prompt a dramatic shift in U.S. foreign policy, leading to the invasions of Afghanistan (2001) and Iraq (2003), which become protracted conflicts testing the limits of American power and global leadership.
- 2008: The global financial crisis originates in the U.S. housing market, triggering a worldwide recession and raising questions about the sustainability of American economic hegemony; China’s rapid recovery and growth begin to shift the global balance of power.
- 2011: The U.S. leads a NATO intervention in Libya, but the aftermath — chaos and civil war — fuels debates about the effectiveness and consequences of American-led military interventions.
- 2013: Edward Snowden’s leaks reveal extensive U.S. global surveillance programs, sparking international outrage and damaging trust among allies, while highlighting the technological reach of American intelligence agencies.
- 2015: The U.S. and other world powers sign the Paris Climate Agreement, but domestic political shifts later lead to American withdrawal (2017), signaling a retreat from multilateral environmental leadership.
- 2015: The Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA) is finalized, representing a high point of U.S. diplomatic engagement, but the U.S. unilaterally exits the agreement in 2018, straining relations with European allies and undermining the credibility of American commitments.
- 2016: The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), a massive trade deal championed by the Obama administration as a counter to China’s economic rise, is abandoned by the U.S. after the election of Donald Trump, leaving a vacuum in Asia-Pacific economic governance.
- 2017: The Trump administration officially labels China a “strategic competitor” in the National Security Strategy, marking a pivot to “great power competition” and acknowledging the relative decline of unipolar American dominance.
Sources
- https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/129b46e646351e8f71bcbf510170d9a99f9b8d71
- https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/43ff44f851cd724b217313e233f3fc43aa865559
- https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1117&context=classracecorporatepower
- https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7122483/
- https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/23311886.2023.2300527?needAccess=true
- https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/23311983.2023.2286076?needAccess=true
- https://www.ijfmr.com/papers/2024/4/25402.pdf
- https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/1758-5899.12609
- https://fastcapitalism.journal.library.uta.edu/index.php/fastcapitalism/article/download/371/463
- http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rbpi/v61n2/1983-3121-rbpi-61-2-e002.pdf