Select an episode
Not playing

Charles V and du Guesclin Change the Game

Avoid big battles, choke garrisons, buy back captains. Charles V and du Guesclin reclaim territory through attrition and sieges, with early cannon rumbling. The English tide ebbs.

Episode Narrative

In the year 1364, a new chapter unfurled in the tumultuous saga of the Hundred Years’ War. Charles V ascended the throne of France during a time when the specter of English dominance loomed large. The Treaty of Brétigny, signed in 1360, had granted the English vast territories across France, marking a period of English supremacy. Yet, as Charles took his place on the crown, he was determined to reverse this tide. He envisioned a military strategy that would not rely on the glory of grand battles. Instead, he sought a methodical approach characterized by attrition, sieges, and targeted raids. This vision would not only define his reign but also transform the nature of warfare in medieval times.

Charles V understood that traditional, large-scale pitched battles rarely yielded a decisive outcome in his favor. The battlefield was not merely a place of valor but a cruel arena where the balance of power was erratic, shaped by alliances and treachery. He began to meticulously reorganize the French military. The emphasis shifted to small, agile forces, capable of strategic strikes rather than massed confrontations. Under his guidance, the French army would employ siege tactics that could draw out enemy forces and weaken their resolve through sustained pressure.

Enter Bertrand du Guesclin, a pivotal figure destined to shape the course of this conflict. Appointed Constable of France in 1370, du Guesclin became the embodiment of the new French strategy. Positioned as a warrior and a diplomat, he understood the intricacies of warfare were as much about negotiation as they were about arms. His strategy was clear: avoid pitched battles, choke garrisons, and undermine the English by buying back captains who would switch sides. This was a multi-faceted campaign that systematically eroded the English foothold in France.

By 1372, du Guesclin's forces had begun to recapture territories such as Poitou and Saintonge. His campaigns were characterized by a blend of military action and diplomacy. Instead of outright combat, he often chose to negotiate with local lords, convincing them to return to French allegiance. In doing so, he not only expanded French territories but also built a loyal network that fortified Charles V’s reign. The methodology was not just revolutionary; it was effective. Du Guesclin’s astuteness in siege warfare began to pay dividends.

As the 1370s progressed, the French made extensive use of artillery — an innovation that transformed how sieges were conducted. Among the first instances was the fall of La Rochelle in 1372. Early cannons played a decisive role, their formidable presence echoing through the walls of English strongholds. This was no longer merely a battle of swords and shields; it was an era defined by the thunderous roar of gunpowder. What had once been viewed as impregnable fortifications began to crumble, reflecting the technological advancement that was reshaping the medieval battlefield.

Meanwhile, the English continued to launch aggressive raids. In 1373, John of Gaunt spearheaded a massive raid known as the “Chevauchée.” With this, the English sought to seize back their lost glory in France. However, the campaign faltered. Unable to achieve lasting gains, they quickly found themselves mired in the very tactics that had begun to turn against them. The French strategy of avoiding open battle and focusing on attrition rendered such raids ineffective. As they faced the brunt of systemic losses, English control gradually diminished, reduced to the narrow coastal strip from Bordeaux to Bayonne by 1374. The momentum that had once favored the English had markedly shifted.

By the time Charles V succumbed to his final rest in 1380, the landscape of power in France had dramatically redeployed itself. The English had seen their holdings shrink to less than half of what they had secured with the Treaty of Brétigny. Du Guesclin’s strategic brilliance and King Charles’s long-term vision had redefined the war’s parameters. Their campaigns led to the significant recapture of key territories, solidifying the French position across the country.

The capture of Limoges in 1377 marked an essential moment in this narrative. Once a bastion of English strength, Limoges fell to the French, serving as a pivotal point for consolidation in central France. It symbolized the unraveling of English authority, reverberating through the ranks of soldiers and lords alike. Du Guesclin’s mastery of siege tactics and his ability to coordinate military efforts were proving invaluable. The focus on logistical planning had become the foundation of these campaigns, as detailed records of troop movements and supply lines echoed in the annals of French military history.

Yet, it wasn’t only the physical confrontations that shaped this conflict. The French military strategy was deeply intertwined with a robust system of taxation and logistics. Charles V understood that to maintain a standing army capable of sustaining long campaigns, his treasury must be adequately filled. He established means to ensure that both soldiers and supplies were reliably procured. This laid the groundwork for a sustained effort that could weather the storms of warfare.

As the late 1370s rolled into view, the English found themselves increasingly reliant on garrison warfare. Their once-formidable forces were now trapped within the confines of isolated strongholds, vulnerable to the cunning tactics of the French. Many of these positions had become mere shells of their former glory, and the English found themselves flailing against the strategic finesse displayed by du Guesclin and his armies. The attrition strategy, which had systematically weakened the English resolve and military effectiveness, now loomed large, revealing the frailty of what had once been perceived as insurmountable strength.

By 1380, the tide had shifted irrevocably. The English presence had ebbed, and the French had regained control over most territories once lost. This set the stage for the continuing phases of the Hundred Years' War, but the ramifications of Charles V and du Guesclin’s strategies echoed far beyond the shifting borders of France. Their methods had altered the very nature of war, leaving behind lessons that would influence tactics and military thinking for generations.

The legacy of their combined efforts reveals a profound change in medieval warfare. They exercised not only power through strength but wisdom through understanding. The campaigns marked a turning point, signifying the end of an era dominated by the spectacle of grand battles and the rise of a more nuanced approach to conflict that embraced both siege warfare and diplomacy.

As we reflect upon this transformative chapter of history, we may ask ourselves: what do we consider the true nature of power? Is it found in open confrontation, or does it lie in the subtle art of negotiation, the shrewd deployment of resources, and the patience to wait for the opportune moment? Charles V and Bertrand du Guesclin had shown that the path to victory is often paved not just with swords but with the wisdom of strategy and the strength of resolve. They cast a long shadow over history, reminding us that sometimes, the most profound changes begin not with a grand dawn of battle, but in the shadows, where strategy patiently whispers its intentions.

Highlights

  • In 1364, Charles V of France ascended the throne and immediately began reorganizing the French military, shifting from large-scale pitched battles to a strategy of attrition, sieges, and targeted raids, which would become the hallmark of his reign. - Bertrand du Guesclin, appointed Constable of France in 1370, led a campaign of “avoiding pitched battles, choking garrisons, and buying back captains” — a strategy that systematically eroded English holdings in France. - By 1372, du Guesclin’s forces had recaptured Poitou and Saintonge, using a combination of siege warfare and diplomacy to undermine English control, often negotiating with local lords rather than engaging in direct combat. - The French under Charles V and du Guesclin made extensive use of artillery in sieges by the 1370s, with early cannons playing a decisive role in the fall of key English strongholds such as La Rochelle in 1372. - In 1373, the English launched the “Chevauchée of John of Gaunt,” a massive raid across France, but were unable to achieve lasting territorial gains due to the French strategy of avoiding open battle and focusing on attrition. - By 1374, French forces had recaptured most of Aquitaine, reducing English holdings to a narrow coastal strip from Bordeaux to Bayonne, a dramatic reversal from the territorial peak of English control in 1360. - The Treaty of Brétigny (1360) had granted England vast territories in France, but by 1380, when Charles V died, the English held less than half of what they had at the treaty’s signing, a testament to the effectiveness of the French attrition strategy. - Du Guesclin’s campaigns often involved the use of “free companies” — mercenary bands that were either bought off or incorporated into the French army, a tactic that both weakened English forces and bolstered French numbers. - In 1377, the French captured the strategically vital city of Limoges, which had been a key English stronghold, further consolidating their control over central France. - The French strategy of attrition and siege warfare was supported by a robust system of taxation and logistics, allowing Charles V to maintain a standing army and supply his campaigns over long periods. - By the late 1370s, the English were forced to rely increasingly on garrison warfare, with small, isolated strongholds that were vulnerable to French siege and negotiation tactics. - The use of early artillery in sieges, such as at the capture of La Rochelle, marked a technological turning point in medieval warfare, foreshadowing the decline of traditional castle defenses. - The French campaigns under Charles V and du Guesclin were characterized by a high degree of coordination between military and diplomatic efforts, with local lords often being persuaded to switch allegiance through negotiation rather than force. - The attrition strategy led to a significant decline in English military effectiveness, with English forces increasingly unable to mount large-scale offensives or defend their remaining territories. - By 1380, the English tide had ebbed, and the French had regained control of most of their territory, setting the stage for the later phases of the Hundred Years’ War. - The French strategy of attrition and siege warfare, combined with the use of early artillery, had a profound impact on the conduct of medieval warfare, influencing military tactics for centuries to come. - The campaigns of Charles V and du Guesclin were marked by a high degree of logistical planning, with detailed records of troop movements, supply lines, and siege operations surviving in French archives. - The French strategy of attrition and siege warfare was supported by a robust system of taxation and logistics, allowing Charles V to maintain a standing army and supply his campaigns over long periods. - The use of early artillery in sieges, such as at the capture of La Rochelle, marked a technological turning point in medieval warfare, foreshadowing the decline of traditional castle defenses. - The French campaigns under Charles V and du Guesclin were characterized by a high degree of coordination between military and diplomatic efforts, with local lords often being persuaded to switch allegiance through negotiation rather than force.

Sources

  1. https://academic.oup.com/ehr/article/133/563/929/5033003
  2. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/CBO9780511581311A102/type/book_part
  3. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1986023?origin=crossref
  4. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.2307/2852873
  5. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13507486.2012.756298
  6. https://academic.oup.com/ahr/article/94/4/1078/50389
  7. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S009513900004895X/type/journal_article
  8. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2944624?origin=crossref
  9. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/9780511581311/type/book
  10. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2107.01098.pdf