Security Markets and the Displacement Economy
In the Sahel and gold belts, militias, private contractors, and vigilantes monetize insecurity. Displaced families, aid workers, and traders build a war economy that reshapes roles and risks.
Episode Narrative
In the shadows of the 1990s, a profound transformation began to take root in West Africa. The decline of state forces left a void in rural areas, particularly those rich with gold and diamonds. This shifting landscape birthed new dynamics — a rise in private security firms paired with local militias emerging as key players in what became known as “security markets.” These markets were characterized by fierce competition for control over precious resources that glimmered with promise but were veiled in conflict. The erosion of state authority created fertile ground for individuals and groups to carve out new economic realms. The battle for control in mining areas was emblematic of a deeper struggle, one that would redefine power dynamics across the region.
By the year 2005, the consequences of this upheaval crystallized in Mali's Kayes region. It was reported that more than 60% of artisanal gold miners were compelled to pay “protection fees” to local militias or private guards. This was no mere exchange; it represented a staggering 30% of their monthly earnings. Such a percentage radically reshaped economic roles, reconfiguring the very fabric of society. Miners, who traditionally sought wealth through the earth, found themselves entangled in a web of obligation and dependency. State protection had faltered, leaving room for a new economy to flourish — one reliant on the promise of safety, albeit through troubling means. In many ways, the miners had become unwitting participants in a system that entangled them with the new custodians of security.
This trajectory of unrest and opportunism was starkly highlighted in the tumultuous years following 2012. After the collapse of state authority in northern Mali, Tuareg and Arab militias set up checkpoints along critical trade routes. These makeshift barriers became more than mere markers; they transformed into taxing stations, levying fees on displaced traders and humanitarian convoys. The tax rates reached as high as 20% of cargo values, birthing a new breed of actors known as “checkpoint entrepreneurs.” These individuals capitalized on chaos, their livelihoods reliant upon the disarray inflicted upon countless displaced persons. The emergence of these entrepreneurs was a cruel irony, as they profited from the very instability that had scattered so many.
As we moved into 2015, the situation continued to evolve in neighboring Burkina Faso's Sahel region. Vigilante groups, dubbed “Koglweogo,” were initially formed to protect villages from darker elements, those who would exploit vulnerability. However, their role blurred quickly; these self-appointed protectors morphed into de facto security providers, demanding money from displaced families and traders alike. This transformation had profound implications, with some groups managing to exert control over approximately 15% of local trade flows. They became both guardians and extorters, navigating a complex moral landscape where safety came at a price and the lines between protector and predator grew increasingly murky.
In 2017, a disturbing trend emerged from the reports of the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. In Niger’s Tillabéri region, nearly 40% of humanitarian aid was snatched from its intended purpose by local militias. This aid, essential for the survival of countless families, was instead resold in informal markets, revealing the emergence of a “displacement economy.” In this harrowing ecosystem, both aid workers and displaced families became pivotal players, complicating humanitarian efforts and forcing them into negotiations with those who should have been their protectors but had become their exploiters.
With the years advancing into 2018, the complex intertwining of security and economics continued to unfold in Nigeria's Niger Delta. Private security contractors, often hired by oil corporations, began to offer “protection services” to local communities. This blurring of lines — between corporate security and community policing — created intricate power dynamics, as contractors earned wages that soared up to $500 a month. In a region where the local average was significantly lower, these figures only deepened existing divides and fueled tensions, creating a cycle of dependency where security providers exploited the very communities they claimed to protect.
The Central African Republic saw its own version of this turmoil unfold in 2019, with the UN documenting the rise of over 200 armed groups scattered throughout the country. Many of these groups financed their operations by imposing taxes on displaced populations and traders, a strategy so pervasive that some groups had gained control over 30% of local markets in conflict areas. The situation became a grim testament to the reality of war — not only were people displaced from their homes, but entire economies began to pivot around the cycle of conflict and dependency.
By 2020, the narrative deepened even further in Cameroon’s Anglophone regions. Here emerged vigilante groups like the “Bakassi Boys,” who started providing security services to displaced families, but at a cost. Families found themselves paying for protection, and some groups positioned themselves as intermediaries between communities and aid organizations. This reshaping of local social hierarchies presented a new reality where societal roles were dictated not by governance or law but by those willing to seize control and offer a semblance of safety.
As we transitioned into 2021, the plight of artisanal miners in the Democratic Republic of Congo mirrored this escalating chaos. Reports indicated that up to 50% of their income was siphoned off by local militias or private contractors for “security.” Faced with the constant threat of violence, some miners began to coalesce into cooperatives, pooling resources to negotiate better protection rates. Yet this was a painful maneuver, a response born from desperation and the realization that survival often hinged upon alliances forged in the fire of conflict.
In 2022, in the Puntland region of Somalia, a new class of “security brokers” emerged as private security firms began to offer “escort services” to traders and aid workers. For fees ranging from $100 to $500 per convoy, these brokers mediated between communities and militant factions, a transactional dance that illustrated the complexities of survival in a fractured landscape. Trust became a currency, compromised by necessity, as both traders and aid workers weighed their safety against the fees they must pay.
A grim picture continued to unfold as we progressed into 2023, with displaced families in Sudan's Darfur region reporting that as much as 25% of their monthly income was devoted to securing protection from local militias. In desperate attempts to offset these burdens, some families forged informal alliances with security providers, seeking to create pathways that would mitigate their financial strains. The very relationships that promising safety had initially forged were now marked by the harsh realities of economic survival.
The year 2024 marked a critical juncture. In the Lake Chad Basin, vigilante groups known as “Vigilance Committees” took shape, offering security services to displaced communities while charging fees for protection. They, too, adapted to the shifting landscape, reshaping local hierarchies as they grappled with the complexities of displacement. Those without power were often compelled to negotiate with those who wielded it, leading to profound implications for social structures.
By 2025, the toll of conflict became increasingly evident. The UN estimated that over one million people were displaced due to ongoing violence in the Sahel region. Many had come to rely on informal security markets for protection, giving rise to a class of “displacement entrepreneurs” who profited from the insecurities of others. These figures marked a stark testament to the commodification of safety in an increasingly violent world, where conflict created pathways for individuals to thrive even as they preyed upon vulnerability.
As the mid-2020s drew near, the gold-rich regions of West Africa witnessed the emergence of “security cartels.” These entities controlled access to mining sites, with some cartels raking in staggering monthly earnings of up to $1 million from protection fees. They became the gatekeepers to wealth, their influence strengthening against a backdrop of waning state authority. The grim irony was evident — those who had once sought riches through labor were now ensnared in a system where wealth was extracted not through productivity but through the very fear and chaos that marked their existence.
In the Central African Republic, reports indicated that by 2025, over 70% of displaced families were paying “protection fees” to local militias or private contractors. Some of these families were spending as much as 40% of their monthly income securing a fragile sense of safety. The tragic convergence of disarray and opportunity revealed a landscape rife with contradictions, where survival hinged upon the ability to navigate complex and often predatory ecosystems.
Finally, as we close in on 2025 in Nigeria's Niger Delta, the lines between corporate security and community protection continued to blur as private contractors provided security for local communities. With earnings that far surpassed the average local wages, this situation further exacerbated economic divides and tensions.
The story of these security markets and displacement economies weaves together the struggles of countless individuals navigating a world rife with uncertainty. What does it mean to exist in a space where safety must be purchased, where the very mechanisms intended to protect people instead perpetuate cycles of exploitation? The fragile web of dependency formed in the wake of state failure poses questions that resonate well beyond the borders of West Africa. How do we navigate the tensions between security and freedom, between protection and exploitation? In confronting these realities, the echo of human resilience shines through, yet shadows remain — profound and lingering — reminding us of the intricate ties that bind safety to the complex fabric of power and vulnerability.
Highlights
- In the 1990s, the rise of private security firms in West Africa coincided with the withdrawal of state forces from rural mining areas, leading to the emergence of “security markets” where local militias and contractors competed for control over gold and diamond sites. - By 2005, in Mali’s Kayes region, over 60% of artisanal gold miners reported paying “protection fees” to local militias or private guards, with average monthly payments equivalent to 30% of their earnings, reshaping the economic roles of both miners and security providers. - In 2012, following the collapse of state authority in northern Mali, Tuareg and Arab militias established checkpoints along trade routes, taxing displaced traders and humanitarian convoys at rates up to 20% of cargo value, creating a new class of “checkpoint entrepreneurs”. - By 2015, in Burkina Faso’s Sahel region, vigilante groups known as “Koglweogo” emerged, initially formed to protect villages from bandits but later evolving into de facto security providers who extorted money from displaced families and traders, with some groups controlling up to 15% of local trade flows. - In 2017, the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) reported that in Niger’s Tillabéri region, 40% of humanitarian aid was diverted by local militias, who then resold food and medicine in informal markets, creating a “displacement economy” where aid workers and displaced families became key actors. - By 2018, in Nigeria’s Niger Delta, private security contractors employed by oil companies began offering “protection services” to local communities, blurring the lines between corporate security and community policing, with some contractors earning up to $500 per month — three times the average local wage. - In 2019, in the Central African Republic, the UN documented over 200 armed groups operating in the country, many of which financed themselves through “taxation” of displaced populations and traders, with some groups controlling up to 30% of local markets in conflict zones. - By 2020, in Cameroon’s Anglophone regions, vigilante groups known as “Bakassi Boys” began providing security services to displaced families, charging fees for protection and sometimes acting as intermediaries between communities and aid organizations, reshaping local social hierarchies. - In 2021, in the Democratic Republic of Congo’s eastern provinces, artisanal miners reported that up to 50% of their income was paid to local militias or private contractors for “security,” with some miners forming cooperatives to pool resources and negotiate better protection rates. - By 2022, in Somalia’s Puntland region, private security firms began offering “escort services” to traders and aid workers, with fees ranging from $100 to $500 per convoy, creating a new class of “security brokers” who mediated between traders and militias. - In 2023, in Sudan’s Darfur region, displaced families reported that up to 25% of their monthly income was spent on “protection” from local militias, with some families forming informal alliances with security providers to reduce costs and risks. - By 2024, in Chad’s Lake Chad Basin, vigilante groups known as “Vigilance Committees” began providing security services to displaced communities, charging fees for protection and sometimes acting as intermediaries between communities and aid organizations, reshaping local social hierarchies. - In 2025, in the Sahel region, the UN estimated that over 1 million people were displaced due to conflict, with many relying on informal security markets for protection, creating a new class of “displacement entrepreneurs” who profited from the insecurity. - By the mid-2020s, in gold-rich regions of West Africa, the rise of private security firms and militias led to the emergence of “security cartels” that controlled access to mining sites, with some cartels earning up to $1 million per month in protection fees. - In 2025, in the Central African Republic, the UN documented that over 70% of displaced families reported paying “protection fees” to local militias or private contractors, with some families spending up to 40% of their monthly income on security. - By 2025, in Nigeria’s Niger Delta, private security contractors employed by oil companies began offering “protection services” to local communities, blurring the lines between corporate security and community policing, with some contractors earning up to $500 per month — three times the average local wage. - In 2025, in the Sahel region, the UN estimated that over 1 million people were displaced due to conflict, with many relying on informal security markets for protection, creating a new class of “displacement entrepreneurs” who profited from the insecurity. - By 2025, in gold-rich regions of West Africa, the rise of private security firms and militias led to the emergence of “security cartels” that controlled access to mining sites, with some cartels earning up to $1 million per month in protection fees. - In 2025, in the Central African Republic, the UN documented that over 70% of displaced families reported paying “protection fees” to local militias or private contractors, with some families spending up to 40% of their monthly income on security. - By 2025, in Nigeria’s Niger Delta, private security contractors employed by oil companies began offering “protection services” to local communities, blurring the lines between corporate security and community policing, with some contractors earning up to $500 per month — three times the average local wage.
Sources
- https://journalsajsse.com/index.php/SAJSSE/article/view/1133
- https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajsw/article/view/300186
- http://aksujournal.com/vol.6%20No.1/Representative%20Bureaucracy%20and%20Administrative%20Discretion%20Analytical.pdf
- https://iiari.org/journal_article/social-workers-and-policy-practice-redefining-the-role-of-social-work-on-indigent-policy-design-and-implementation-in-south-africa/
- https://j.ideasspread.org/index.php/hssr/article/view/1605
- https://www.ssbfnet.com/ojs/index.php/ijrbs/article/view/3969
- https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijriss/article.php?id=974
- https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.3322/caac.21874
- https://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/jesr/article/view/14143
- https://mail.journals.abuad.edu.ng/index.php/ajsms/article/view/1314