Select an episode
Not playing

City of Strikes: Mills, Ethnicity, and the Mohajir Moment

Bombay’s 1982 textile strike shatters an old working-class world. Karachi’s factories hum as MQM channels muhajir lower-middle angst into street power. Unions, rackets, and ethnic quotas recast who gets jobs, housing, and protection.

Episode Narrative

In 1947, the world watched as British India, a tapestry of cultures and religions, was torn apart. The Partition laid the foundation for two nations: India and Pakistan. It was a seismic shift, one that would unleash chaos, create new borders, and provoke profound human suffering. Approximately 15 million people were uprooted, forced to flee their homes, while an estimated half a million to two million lives were lost in the communal violence that surged in the aftermath. This upheaval transformed not just the map of South Asia but also the social fabric of communities, leaving wounds that would take generations to heal.

Among those most affected were the working-class migrants known as muhajirs. These Urdu-speaking individuals, who had relocated to Pakistan, found themselves in cities like Karachi, seeking refuge and rebuilding their lives amidst the rubble of displacement. Their arrival marked the beginning of a new chapter in Pakistani history, and the struggles they faced would become emblematic of the broader socio-political tensions that defined the nation. This was not merely a demographic shift; it was a profound cultural and emotional dislocation, as these individuals grappled with the loss of their homes and the uncertainty of their future.

The muhajirs settled primarily in urban centers, where they formed a distinct lower-middle-class ethnic group. Their integration was never seamless. They encountered friction with the indigenous Sindhi population and other ethnic groups, which exacerbated their struggle for jobs, housing, and political representation. The scars of Partition remained open, intricately woven into the very identity of the newly formed nation. The new arrivals would face a harsh reality, marked by economic challenges and social marginalization, as they sought to assert their place in a rapidly evolving society.

As the years passed, this environment of uncertainty and tension began to crystallize into more organized forms of political expression. In the years leading up to the 1960s, the working class in India, particularly in industrial cities like Bombay, consisted of migrants from various backgrounds, many of whom worked in the thriving textile mills. Here, labor unions emerged as crucial actors in shaping the social and economic landscape, providing a platform for the workers to assert their rights and identity amidst a web of ethnic diversity. Yet, while some communities found solidarity in labor movements, others were left to navigate the complexities of identity and belonging on their own.

In East Pakistan, the seeds of discontent began to sprout with the Bengali Language Movement in 1952. This movement highlighted the ethnic and linguistic disparities within Pakistan, echoing the larger social class and regional inequalities that simmered beneath the surface. The demands for linguistic recognition and cultural rights were a precursor to the broader political upheaval that would culminate in the 1971 Bangladesh Liberation War. Meanwhile, in Karachi, the muhajir community grew increasingly aware of its own vulnerabilities, bound together not just by shared ethnicity but also by shared hardship and resilience.

By the late 1960s and early 1970s, Karachi’s muhajirs began to mobilize politically, culminating in the rise of the Muhajir Qaumi Movement, or MQM. This powerful ethnic party channeled the frustrations of the muhajir lower-middle class, asserting their demands against a backdrop of perceived discrimination and exclusion. The shift from traditional class-based politics to ethnic identity politics marked a significant turning point in urban Pakistan. The political landscape was changing, and the muhajirs were determined to carve out their own space in this new order.

In 1970, the general elections exposed the fissures that lay just beneath the surface of Pakistani society. Ethnic and class divisions came to the fore, with the majority population of East Pakistan demanding autonomy. The subsequent failure to accommodate these aspirations led to a civil war that would uproot even more lives and ultimately give birth to Bangladesh — a nation forged from the fires of conflict. The unraveling of Pakistan continued to complicate ethnic relations, as mistrust and animosity flared among its diverse constituents, each vying for recognition and resources.

Simultaneously, industrial centers like Bombay began to experience profound shifts of their own. The textile mills, which had formed the backbone of the city's working class, were now in decline. Economic changes and persistent labor unrest painted a grim picture for mill workers, leading to significant strikes such as the monumental 1982 textile strike led by union leader Dutta Samant. This strike was unlike anything seen before, involving over 250,000 workers in a battle that lasted more than a year. The mill doors, once busy with labor, would soon be permanently closed, marking the end of an era. With the mills shut down, many workers found themselves adrift, pushed into informal sectors or forced to migrate elsewhere in search of work.

As the 1980s progressed, the decline of Bombay’s mills echoed the rise of new economic sectors, yet the urban social class structure began to fragment. Ethnic identities sharpened against the backdrop of growing unrest. In Karachi, the MQM consolidated its grip over neighborhoods, wielding a combination of grassroots activism, street-level power, and often, intimidation. The social order was reconfigured, with ethnic quotas in jobs and housing reshaping the socioeconomic landscape. The divide between different groups grew ever wider, as access to economic opportunities became a matter of ethnicity rather than merit.

Both India and Pakistan remained mired in persistent social stratification, with caste and ethnicity dictating life choices and social mobility. In India, caste-based identities played a critical role in determining access to education and employment, further perpetuating cycles of poverty and marginalization. Similarly, in Pakistan, linguistic and ethnic identities began to entwine with class, complicating social roles and contributing to ongoing conflicts.

Post-Partition, the resettlement of millions of refugees created a new class of urban social actors entwined in economic hardship. Initially occupying many government and white-collar jobs, the muhajirs soon encountered a rapidly changing economic landscape. This environment was rife with competition, particularly from indigenous groups, which further strained ethnic relations. The anticipation of a new life in Pakistan had quickly soured as they faced the reality of exclusion and resentment, demonstrating the complexities of belonging in a society still grappling with the ramifications of violence and division.

As labor politics began to shift, unions that had once been vibrant voices for workers' rights saw their influence begin to wane, particularly by the late 1980s. This downturn was attributed to economic liberalization, political repression, and the rise of ethnicity-based politics. The structures that had once supported the working class faced dissolution, forcing many into increasingly precarious positions.

Housing and urban space became battlegrounds for ethnic and class-based struggles. Segregation in cities like Karachi and Bombay evidenced how deeply established social divisions affected access to basic needs. Political patronage and ethnic quotas dictated who could secure housing in desirable neighborhoods, further entrenching social hierarchies.

Against this backdrop, women often found their aspirations curtailed by patriarchal constraints. While they played significant roles in political movements during pivotal moments, such as the Pakistan Movement, their contributions often went unrecognized. Within working-class and rural communities, women faced dual challenges of gender and class, navigating a world defined by systemic inequities.

Education emerged as another front in the battle for social mobility. Disparities along class and ethnic lines persisted, limiting opportunities for rural and marginalized communities across both nations. The continuing struggle for quality education reinforced existing social stratification, perpetuating cycles of poverty.

The economic impact of Partition reverberated through the years. Disrupted networks led to a scenario where Pakistan lost vital industrial and financial centers while India faced challenges integrating a vast influx of refugees. The fragmentation of economic stability exacerbated existing inequalities, making the struggle for survival all the more acute.

Within this context of ethnic conflict and social development, policies often marginalized poorer communities, creating a wider chasm between the haves and have-nots. Engagement with the state became increasingly fraught, as ethnic divisions shaped governance and community needs.

As we take a step back, reflecting on the legacy of this complex era, one cannot help but ask: What does it mean to strive for an identity in a landscape fractured by migration and violence? The echoes of the past are woven into the identities and experiences of millions, shaping their aspirations and struggles. The story of the muhajir community, the struggles of Bombay’s mill workers, and the persistent class disparities reveal a poignant truth: the quest for dignity, belonging, and justice transcends borders and time. In our search for a shared tomorrow, we must confront the historical injustices that continue to cast long shadows on our paths. What lessons will we carry forward as we navigate the evolving landscapes of our urban realities? The answers may still be waiting to be revealed in the echoes of history.

Highlights

  • 1947: The Partition of British India led to the creation of India and Pakistan, triggering the largest mass migration in human history with approximately 15 million displaced and between 0.5 to 2 million killed in communal violence. This upheaval deeply fractured social and emotional lives, especially affecting working-class and migrant communities known as muhajirs, who faced displacement and resettlement challenges.
  • 1947-1950s: Post-Partition, the muhajir community in Pakistan, primarily Urdu-speaking migrants from India, settled mostly in urban centers like Karachi, where they formed a distinct lower-middle-class ethnic group. Their social position was marked by tensions with indigenous Sindhi and other ethnic groups, influencing access to jobs, housing, and political power.
  • 1950s-1960s: In India, the working class in industrial cities such as Bombay (now Mumbai) was largely composed of diverse ethnic groups, including migrants from rural areas. Textile mills were a major source of employment, with mill workers forming a significant part of the urban proletariat. These workers were often organized into unions that played a key role in labor politics and social identity.
  • 1952: The Bengali Language Movement in East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) highlighted ethnic and linguistic divisions within Pakistan, reflecting broader social class and regional disparities that would later contribute to political upheaval and the 1971 Bangladesh Liberation War.
  • 1960s-1970s: Karachi’s muhajir population increasingly mobilized politically through the Muhajir Qaumi Movement (MQM), which emerged as a powerful ethnic party channeling the frustrations of the muhajir lower-middle class over perceived discrimination in employment, housing, and political representation. MQM’s rise marked a shift from traditional class-based politics to ethnic identity politics in urban Pakistan.
  • 1970: The general elections in Pakistan exposed deep ethnic and class divisions, with East Pakistan’s majority population demanding autonomy. The failure to accommodate these demands led to the 1971 civil war and the creation of Bangladesh, further complicating social class and ethnic relations in Pakistan.
  • 1970s-1980s: Bombay’s textile mills, once the backbone of the city’s working class, faced decline due to economic changes and labor unrest. The 1982 textile strike, led by union leader Dutta Samant, involved over 250,000 workers and lasted over a year, effectively shutting down the mills and ending an era of organized mill labor. This strike shattered the old working-class world and accelerated the decline of mill-based employment, forcing workers into informal sectors or migration.
  • 1980s: The decline of Bombay’s mills coincided with the rise of new economic sectors and a shift in urban social classes. The working class fragmented, and ethnic and communal identities became more pronounced in labor and housing struggles, especially in Mumbai and Karachi.
  • 1980s: In Karachi, MQM consolidated control over many urban neighborhoods, using a combination of political activism, street power, and informal protection rackets. This reconfiguration of urban social order involved ethnic quotas in jobs and housing, reshaping who accessed economic opportunities and social services.
  • Throughout 1945-1991: Both India and Pakistan experienced persistent social stratification influenced by caste, ethnicity, and class. In India, caste-based identities continued to shape access to education, employment, and political power, while in Pakistan, ethnic and linguistic identities intersected with class to define social roles and conflicts.

Sources

  1. https://read.dukeupress.edu/journal-of-asian-studies/article/52/1/187/335726
  2. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8679035fa91a843c9ab9047ad88a6043a51c656f
  3. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0041977X00015251/type/journal_article
  4. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0022463400010870/type/journal_article
  5. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/66881d19c921942a430fc060f5fe5d940a5f8532
  6. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c2126af987951c98deac1244e8e45ce91ed99d1a
  7. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0007125000141625/type/journal_article
  8. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2165412?origin=crossref
  9. http://ro.ecu.edu.au/ajte/vol16/iss1/1
  10. https://doiserbia.nb.rs/Article.aspx?ID=1450-98142335153T