Select an episode
Not playing

New Names, Old Stigma

An 1871 edict frees eta and hinin as “new commoners,” yet prejudice lingers. The koseki family registry gives everyone surnames — and lets the state see into households. Village heads give way to prefectural police, while new taxes remake rural life.

Episode Narrative

New Names, Old Stigma

In the year 1871, a significant transformation began to reshape the social landscape of Japan. The Meiji government, in a bold move aimed at modernization and inclusion, officially abolished the castes of eta and hinin — groups long stigmatized and ostracized, often relegated to the edges of society. This reform reclassified them as “new commoners,” or shinheimin, granting them surnames and integrating their identities into the koseki, or family registry system. It was a radical attempt to erase the visible markers of social division. Yet, beneath the surface of this legal decree, the shadows of prejudice continued to loom large. The issuance of a new name did not guarantee dignity or acceptance. The societal stigma persisted.

In this era of change, the koseki system represented a dual sword — one that ushered in a new order while simultaneously reinforcing state surveillance. Every household in Japan was required to register with the government, effectively creating a comprehensive log of family structures and social statuses. This not only solidified the state’s control over its citizens but also altered the very fabric of Japanese society, marking a transition from feudal ties to bureaucratic governance. The individual was now tethered to a system that monitored their existence, a reflection of a society on the cusp of modernity.

As the Meiji period unfolded, further structural changes emerged. The traditional village heads, the nanushi, who had once been the stewards of local governance and tax collection, were gradually replaced. New forces — prefectural police and government-appointed officials — took their place. This shift illustrated a relentless centralization of power, as the state asserted control over rural life. The villages that had thrived under their own customs were now governed by distant authorities, reshaping local identities into mere echoes of their former selves.

With the economic landscape in flux, new tax reforms erupted during the 1880s. The old rice tax, a cornerstone of agricultural life, was replaced by a monetary tax system, introducing a new level of pressure on the peasantry. Farmers were thrust into the turbulent waters of commercialization, compelled to engage in cash-crop production to meet these demands. The old ways of life faded, replaced by a relentless drive toward profit. Rural communities began to fragment as social stratification deepened, revealing a chasm between the wealthy landowners and their increasingly indebted tenants.

In 1884, tensions boiled over in the form of a peasant uprising among sericulturists. Silk farmers, once the pride of rural Japan, found themselves ensnared in debt peonage. This was a poignant reminder that progress came at a steep cost. The promise of modernization didn’t harmonize with rural realities; it was a storm simmering beneath the surface of political edicts and philosophical proclamations.

The majority of workers in the burgeoning textile factories, emerging during this period, were young, unmarried women. They entered the industrial workforce at alarming rates, marking a watershed moment in gendered labor roles. Women moved from the confines of rural homesteads into the factories, a transition that not only redefined economic participation but also transformed family dynamics. The very core of society — the family — was now caught in the tumult of change.

Simultaneously, as the samurai class lost its traditional privileges with the abolition of stipends and the feudal system, many found themselves grappling with newfound postures in a rapidly evolving landscape. No longer the samurai elite, they sought roles in government, business, or the military, while others descended into economic despair. The cultural values they once embodied — the samurai ethos of bushidō — were repurposed by the state to promote nationalism. Confucian and Buddhist moral precepts were woven into a modern ideology that inspired loyalty but also constrained individual thought.

Amid these upheavals, a new middle class began to rise, composed not of warriors, but of merchants, bureaucrats, and industrialists. This shift challenged the old social order, as increased literacy and a dissemination of education paved the way for social mobility. The educational reforms, heavily influenced by Western thought, began to infiltrate various strata of society. Intellectuals and reformers emerged, questioning traditional hierarchies and advocating for change in a rapidly modernizing Japan.

Even with legal reforms that ostensibly aimed for equality, the former outcast groups of eta and hinin were still ensnared in the web of social stigma. Despite their new classification as commoners, they were often confined to roles deemed impure — tasks such as leatherworking and butchery. The irony was stark: legally recognized yet still marginalized, their presence reflected the persistent shadows of prejudice that lingered in the collective consciousness of society.

The koseki system and new family laws reframed household dynamics and established patriarchal hierarchies, elevating the nuclear family model relevant to the Meiji state’s vision. While women gained new educational opportunities, their autonomy continued to be circumscribed within traditional gender roles, a contradiction of progress.

As urbanization and industrialization swept across Japan, a distinct working class began to emerge. Factory workers, artisans, and services became primary components of bustling urban life. Yet not all shared in the anticipated prosperity. Segregated neighborhoods formed around class lines, with labor associations springing up in response to the growing unrest over labor rights. Progress was uneven, echoing through the cracks of societal expectations and economic realities.

The state’s initiatives sought to build a collective national identity — a kokutai that transcended class divisions. Yet, the reality was starkly different. Elites maintained control of political power and economic resources. Meanwhile, peasants and laborers faced a whirlwind of hardships, their aspirations often thwarted by systemic inequities.

By the late 19th century, the cultural landscape was also shifting. An urban working class began to engage with new cultural expressions, such as ukiyo-e art that captured the vibrancy of urban life, portraying courtesans and kabuki actors. These pieces reflected the intertwining of class dynamics and artistic expression, providing a mirror to society’s multifaceted nature. The commercial rise of the chonin, or townspeople, marked a new chapter in Japan’s narrative, paving the way for new dialogues about identity and modernity.

As the early 20th century approached, pawnshops emerged as vital financial institutions for the lower classes. A response to economic disparity, these shops became lifelines during crises, including the influenza pandemic of 1918-1920. The working class turned to them, illustrating the persistent necessity of survival and adaptation amid turmoil.

The efforts of the Meiji state to standardize social categories through the introduction of surnames and family registries were significant. These reforms symbolized progress in governance. However, they also underscored the enduring reality of societal discrimination. Legal recognition didn’t equate with social acceptance.

Ultimately, this chapter in Japan's history invites us to reflect on the complexity of progress. The aspirations of the Meiji government clashed with the realities of social structures deeply rooted in centuries-old beliefs. New names were not enough to erase old stigmas. As these changes swept across the nation, the people of Japan grappled with the overlapping currents of modernization, retaining fragments of their past while navigating the uncertain waters of a new identity. Through this story, we are reminded that history is often not merely the record of change, but a profound exploration of resilience in the face of prejudice. What does it mean to move forward while carrying the weight of the past? How does a society redefine itself while still grappling with division? As we ponder these questions, the narrative of Japan in the late 19th and early 20th centuries serves not just as a historical account, but as a poignant reminder of the challenges that accompany any quest for transformation.

Highlights

  • 1871: The Meiji government issued an edict abolishing the legal status of the eta and hinin outcast groups, reclassifying them as "new commoners" (shinheimin), granting them surnames and integrating them into the koseki family registry system; however, social prejudice and discrimination against these groups persisted despite legal reforms.
  • 1871: The introduction of the koseki (family registry) system mandated that all Japanese households register with the state, giving everyone surnames and enabling the government to monitor family structures and social status, which was a significant tool for social control and modernization of governance.
  • 1870s-1880s: Village heads (nanushi), who traditionally managed local affairs and tax collection, were gradually replaced by prefectural police and government-appointed officials, reflecting the centralization and bureaucratization of rural administration under the Meiji state.
  • 1880s: New tax reforms transformed rural life by replacing the traditional rice tax with a monetary tax system, which pressured peasants to engage in cash-crop production and wage labor, accelerating rural commercialization and social stratification.
  • 1884: A notable peasant uprising occurred among indebted sericulturists (silk farmers) in rural Japan, highlighting the tensions caused by new landlordism, debt peonage, and deteriorating conditions for rural workers during early industrialization.
  • 1880-1914: The majority of workers in emerging textile factories were young, unmarried women, marking a significant gendered shift in labor supply and social roles, as women moved from rural household work to industrial wage labor, which also affected family dynamics and social class mobility.
  • Late 19th century: The samurai class lost its privileged status with the abolition of their stipends and the dissolution of the feudal class system, forcing many samurai to seek new roles in government, business, or the military, while some faced downward social mobility.
  • Meiji era (1868-1912): The samurai ethos and values (bushidō) were repurposed by the state to foster nationalism and loyalty, blending Confucian and Buddhist moral precepts into a modern ideology that influenced education, military service, and social expectations.
  • 1870s-1914: The rise of a new middle class composed of merchants, bureaucrats, and industrialists challenged the old social order, with increased literacy and education (including Confucian learning) facilitating social mobility and the spread of modern capitalist values.
  • Early 20th century: Despite legal equality, former outcast groups such as the eta and hinin continued to face social stigma and were often confined to certain occupations, such as leatherworking and butchery, which were considered impure by mainstream society.

Sources

  1. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1052150X14000013/type/journal_article
  2. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03086534.2024.2445735
  3. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781317892854
  4. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7c28bc1cefa8d6c535f0344b44fda7b6fcedc05c
  5. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1755182X.2012.697487
  6. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ae696e65cb2b4556100dd3f255b607e6ec448946
  7. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/25143225?origin=crossref
  8. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07053436.1983.10715145
  9. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4d5ad3d3153defc1095253f0d69555fe0d35b402
  10. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/084387149700900112