Dealmakers: From Backchannels to Abraham Accords
Covert ties bloom into 2020 normalization with UAE, Bahrain, Morocco. Tech, tourism, and jets mix with Palestinian sidelining; Sudan wavers; Saudi weighs a grand bargain — security guarantees for recognition.
Episode Narrative
In the late 20th century, the Middle East stood at a crossroads, a battleground of competing ideologies, old animosities, and emerging opportunities. The Gulf War of 1991 was a flashpoint, igniting a series of conflicts that would reshape the region's geopolitical landscape. This pivotal moment saw a coalition of countries, led by the United States, forcefully expel Iraqi forces from Kuwait. The consequences were far-reaching. Not only did this military action reaffirm U.S. dominance in the region, but it also reinforced the strategic importance of oil, a lifeblood that fueled economies and influenced global politics.
The Gulf War marked the beginning of a new era. American boots were set firmly on Middle Eastern soil, ostensibly to ensure stability and safeguard oil resources. However, the ramifications were complex. Heightened U.S. involvement sowed the seeds of resentment among many in the region, who viewed this as an unwelcome foreign influence. Amongst the swirling tides of war and diplomacy, a sliver of hope emerged in the form of the Oslo Accords in the early 1990s. These agreements initiated a long-awaited peace process between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization, or PLO. For the first time, the prospect of a two-state solution seemed tangible. But it was a fragile hope, built on a precarious foundation.
As the decades progressed, the optimism surrounding the Oslo Accords rapidly faded. By the year 2000, the vision of coexistence was marred by violence and political stalemate. The unresolved issues — borders, refugees, and the status of Jerusalem — tugged incessantly at the fabric of peace, eventually unraveling it completely. This period marked a turning point, as frustrations boiled over into renewed conflict and hostility.
The geopolitical landscape continued to shift rapidly. In 2003, the United States launched a controversial invasion of Iraq, toppling President Saddam Hussein’s regime. This marked a dramatic rearrangement of power dynamics, weakening one of Iran’s primary rivals. The fallout was immediate and significant, igniting sectarian conflict that sent ripples of instability across Iraq and into neighboring countries. Ethnic and sectarian divisions, long simmering beneath the surface, erupted into violent confrontation. The idea of democracy, touted as a byproduct of U.S. intervention, became entangled in a web of insurgency and chaos, leading to years of turmoil in a country once seen as a centerpiece of Arab nationalism.
Against this backdrop of conflict, the Arab Spring of 2011 unfurled with the fervor of revolts across the region. Tunisia led the charge, sparking hopes for reform in countries like Egypt and Yemen. But alongside this wave of optimism, civil wars erupted in Syria and Libya, plunging the region into deeper chaos. The struggle for freedom quickly morphed into a complex battle for power, overshadowing the very aspirations that once ignited the protests. This new turbulence not only complicated the Israeli-Palestinian conflict but intensified longstanding regional power struggles, with various factions vying for dominance.
In Syria, the civil war became a theater for proxy actors, with Iran, Russia, Turkey, and Gulf monarchies, each drawing red lines and positioning their pieces on the board. Non-state actors emerged, such as Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham, gaining ground amid the wreckage of the state. The landscape of conflict was increasingly convoluted, blurring the lines between ally and enemy, friend and foe.
Between 2014 and 2018, the rise of ISIS captured global attention, introducing a new cycle of jihadist governance that tested the limits of state authority. Their ruthless control over vast territories in Iraq and Syria challenged established power structures and prompted an unprecedented response from both regional and international military forces. The world watched in horror as Western nations mounted campaigns aimed at eradicating the brutal extremist group.
Amid the chaos, the U.S. moved decisively in 2017, officially recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital. This decision sent shockwaves through the region, escalating tensions between Palestinians and their Arab neighbors. The status of Jerusalem has long been a contentious issue, and this policy shift underscored a broader realignment in U.S. foreign policy, particularly under the Trump administration. It appeared that the dreams of a peaceful resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict were becoming increasingly elusive.
In 2018, the narratives surrounding Iran took a sharp turn. The U.S. withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal reintroduced sanctions that sent economic shockwaves through Iranian society. The repercussions of this withdrawal expanded beyond Iran’s borders, as Tehran intensified its support for proxy groups across the region, further complicating the intricate web of geopolitical relationships.
In 2020, amidst the turmoil, the Abraham Accords emerged as a beacon of unexpected diplomacy. These agreements formalized normalization between Israel, the United Arab Emirates, and Bahrain, expanding regional alliances in a way that had seemed unthinkable a decade prior. This marked a historic shift, sidelining the Palestinian issue while opening new avenues for cooperation. Technology, tourism, and military partnerships flourished as new pacts reshaped relationships long defined by animosity.
However, beneath the surface, the unresolved Palestinian situation persisted as a central destabilizing factor. The optimism generated by the Accords was tempered by the stark reality that peace remained a distant dream for many. The human stories embedded within this geopolitical tableau were often overshadowed by political maneuvering and grand strategies. The plight of Palestinians remained, locked in a cycle of desperation and disappointment as the world around them moved on.
As the years progressed into 2021 and beyond, Iran’s “axis of resistance” grew more confrontational. Groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah intensified their hostilities with Israel, emboldened by Tehran's financial and military support. Israel, in turn, fortified its military capabilities with increased assistance from the United States. The fragile balance of power teetered precariously, held together by threads of alliances and enmities that spanned the region.
By 2023, the political landscape of the region continued to reflect profound uncertainties. The instability in Sudan demonstrated the complexities of shifting alliances among Gulf states and external powers trying to establish influence in a fractured environment. At the same time, Bashar al-Assad's regime in Syria faced new challenges as Turkey and Gulf monarchies began to reshape their strategies in a war-weary country. The prolonged conflict had weakened Assad's grip, allowing other power players to gain influence and reshape the territory's dynamics.
As the world approached 2024 and beyond, the U.S. government found itself recalibrating its Middle East policy under the leadership of President Trump’s second term. The focus shifted towards a great power leadership approach, attempting to manage the intricate web of relationships surrounding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, all while countering Iranian influence.
Yet as the future loomed, violence flared anew in the Gaza Strip and southern Lebanon, as radical Islamist groups reignited longstanding hostilities. The echoes of unresolved Palestinian issues intermingled with the ongoing proxy conflict between Iran and Israel, reflecting a longstanding volatility that seemed to resist resolution.
The tapestry of the Middle East from 1991 to 2025 illustrates a tapestry of profound challenges and missed opportunities. Despite diplomatic engagements and inter-state alliances, the unresolved Palestinian issue remains a tragic thread woven into the fabric of regional politics. Each failed peace effort serves as a somber reminder of the complexities involved, a mirror reflecting competing interests that thwart a lasting resolution.
This period also highlights the intricate interplay of state and non-state actors, each carving out their own narratives against the backdrop of rampant sectarian divisions, rendered more chaotic by external interventions from powers such as the U.S. and Russia. Economic factors, particularly regarding oil wealth and the control of energy resources, continue fueling power struggles, showcasing how deeply intertwined these issues are with the geopolitical landscape.
As we reflect on this tumultuous history, one must consider the legacy of the past two decades. The Arab Spring, full of promise, bore the weight of increased authoritarianism and repression in many states, leaving behind a reverberating discontent that altered governance across the region.
The Abraham Accords represent a significant, yet complicated, realignment in Middle Eastern politics, intermingling diplomacy with economic ambition. However, in doing so, they have deepened the chasms existing within the region, particularly regarding the plight of the Palestinians, who remain ensnared in a cycle of political sidelining.
As we navigate these intricate histories, the questions linger. Can pathways to peace be forged where there are only open wounds? Will the dream of a stable, equitable Middle East remain just that — a dream? The challenges ahead are immense, yet history has shown us the importance of perseverance in the face of adversity. The story continues, shaped by countless voices, each yearning for resolution and peace in a tumultuous region.
Highlights
- 1991: The Gulf War marked a pivotal moment in Middle East geopolitics, with the US-led coalition expelling Iraqi forces from Kuwait, reinforcing US military presence and influence in the region to secure oil resources and regional stability.
- 1993-2000: The Oslo Accords initiated a peace process between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), but despite initial optimism, the failure to resolve core issues led to renewed violence and political stalemate by 2000.
- 2003: The US invasion of Iraq toppled Saddam Hussein’s regime, dramatically reshaping regional power balances, weakening Iran’s main rival, and triggering sectarian conflict and insurgency that destabilized Iraq and neighboring countries.
- 2011: The Arab Spring uprisings spread across the Middle East, toppling regimes in Tunisia, Egypt, and Yemen, while sparking civil wars in Syria and Libya; these upheavals intensified regional power struggles and complicated the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
- 2011-2015: The Syrian civil war became a proxy battleground involving Iran, Russia, Turkey, Gulf monarchies, and Western powers, with non-state actors like Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham gaining ground against Assad’s regime, further fragmenting the region.
- 2014-2018: The rise and territorial control of ISIS in Iraq and Syria introduced a new cycle of jihadist governance, challenging state authority and prompting international military interventions.
- 2017: The United States recognized Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, escalating tensions with Palestinians and Arab states, while signaling a shift in US Middle East policy under the Trump administration.
- 2018: The US withdrew from the Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA), reimposing sanctions and heightening tensions between Iran and the US, with Iran expanding support to proxy groups in Lebanon, Gaza, and Yemen.
- 2020: The Abraham Accords formalized normalization agreements between Israel and UAE, Bahrain, and later Morocco, marking a historic shift in regional alliances, sidelining the Palestinian issue, and opening new avenues for technology, tourism, and military cooperation.
- 2021-2024: Iran’s “axis of resistance” including Hamas, Hezbollah, and other groups intensified confrontations with Israel, supported by Tehran’s financial and military aid, while Israel received increased US military assistance.
Sources
- http://choicereviews.org/review/10.5860/CHOICE.29-2904
- https://muse.jhu.edu/article/967395
- http://dergipark.org.tr/en/doi/10.69851/car.1723350
- https://jurnal.iainponorogo.ac.id/index.php/dialogia/article/view/10411
- https://invergejournals.com/index.php/ijss/article/view/182
- http://choicereviews.org/review/10.5860/CHOICE.29-0015
- https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/71faa4e940b896ee68b10320dc711ba967411f06
- https://pjia.com.pk/index.php/pjia/article/view/777
- http://www.emerald.com/reps/article/7/4/302-316/365723
- https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/mepo.12760