Select an episode
Not playing

Between Dastgah and Makam: Rivalries in Sound

Along the Ottoman–Safavid frontier, ashugh bards and court ensembles traded modes and rhythms. Diplomacy and war mixed at tents where music spoke — while Habsburg ears at Vienna dreaded, then imitated, the Ottoman beat.

Episode Narrative

Between Dastgah and Makam: Rivalries in Sound

In the heart of the 16th century, a vast empire flourished, stretching from Eastern Europe to the Persian Gulf — the Ottoman Empire. It was a time when culture resonated from every corner of its domains. Music held a profound significance, functioning as both art and diplomacy. At the center of this musical landscape was the makam system, a modal framework that structured melody, weaving intricate auditory tapestries that defined instrumental and vocal performances alike. By the late 1700s, the complexity of the makam system had given rise to hundreds of distinct makams, each with its nuances and emotional weight, creating a vibrant and dynamic musical milieu.

As the Ottomans extended their reach, they also built a reputation through their military bands, known as the mehterân. By the late 1500s, these bands not only echoed the rhythmic pulse of battle but struck a chord deep within the hearts of European armies. Composed of a striking blend of percussion instruments like the kös, davul, and zil, alongside wind instruments such as the zurna and brass sections, the mehterân had a sound designed to astound. It was a sound that both intimidated and fascinated — echoing through the valleys and standing resolute against the backdrop of clashing steel. This auditory phenomenon was more than mere entertainment; it became a tool of power, an emblem of military prowess that would send tremors through the very soul of Europe.

The perception of the Ottomans, however, was complex and laden with anxiety. In 1565, during the visit of French King Charles IX to Bayonne, the Turks were portrayed in elaborate pageants and tournaments, depicted as exotic "Others." This portrayal reflected the trepidations and fascinations of European nations grappling with the burgeoning influence of the Ottoman Empire, both militarily and culturally. The Ottomans were viewed through a dual lens — one of fear and intrigue. Their rich musical traditions were a part of this intrigue, presenting a culture that was as formidable as it was foreign.

As the empire expanded, energetic exchanges of musical ideas swept through its vast territories, particularly between the Ottoman and Safavid empires. Here, the ashugh bards, poet-musicians, traveled back and forth, crafting a unique fusion of dastgah, the Persian modal system, and the Ottoman makam. These exchanges represented not just artistic collaborations, but also a fluid dialogue that transcended borders and resonated with rich local traditions. What emerged was a mosaic of sounds that adapted to differing tastes and political contexts, shining light on the tapestry of shared humanity.

In the 17th and 18th centuries, another pivotal space emerged for music — the coffee house, known as Amane. These establishments grew into veritable hubs for musical subcultures, setting the stage for creative expression among diverse audiences and social classes. Musicians from various backgrounds blended folk and classical styles, creating a rich intermingling of sounds and traditions. In the dimly lit corners of these coffee houses, a dialogue was forged through melody and rhythm, fostering community and connection that brought people together against the backdrop of a fractured world.

As the empire progressed into the late 17th century, the boundaries of music continued to stretch. Ottoman court musicians began to embrace and incorporate elements from Central Asian and Balkan traditions. Through this, the canvas of Ottoman music grew, reflecting both the empire’s vast geographic sweep and its burgeoning cosmopolitan tastes. By the 1700s, architecture and music shared a conceptual bond; builders and musicians alike understood the harmonious relationships between geometry and sound. Architectural tools often resembled musical instruments, designed to conjure “harmonious” effects that echoed the richness of the environment around them.

The influence of Ottoman music did not stop at its borders. European composers, intrigued by the alluring timbres and rhythms of the mehterân, began to imitate the so-called "Turkish" style in their orchestral works. This trend became particularly prominent in the compositions of greats like Mozart and Haydn at the end of the 18th century. The soundwaves that once blurred the boundaries of cultures now rippled across oceans, making their way into the very heart of European classical music.

As the 1600s unfolded, Ottoman musicians showcased an impressive array of stringed instruments, including the tanbur, the ud, and the kemençe. They skillfully accompanied their performances with wind instruments such as the ney and zurna, while the def and darbuka provided rhythmic support. Each note played in a coffee house or at a private gathering carried with it a history, invoking the legacy of a diversity that defined the empire. Musical manuscripts from the 16th and 17th centuries reveal meticulous notations detailing both makam and usul. Some pieces contained specific instructions for tempo and ornamentation, mirroring the disciplined artistry that lay behind each performance.

Within the grand Ottoman court, a hierarchy of musicians flourished, with the chief musician, or hekimbaşı, playing a pivotal role in overseeing performances and training. This organization extended to specialized ensembles meant for varied occasions, blending sacred and secular sounds, as musicians embodied the diversity of cultural backgrounds from which they came — Greeks, Armenians, Jews, and Turks, each contributing to the vibrant tapestry of sound.

Throughout the 1700s, a spirit of experimentation emerged within Ottoman music, as musicians began to explore polyphony. Yet, even in the face of this evolution, the predominant tradition remained monophonic, with a single melodic line delicately supported by rhythmic accompaniment. In public spaces like mosques, coffee houses, and bustling marketplaces, musicians performed for crowds, representing the rich social diversity of musical life.

As the Ottoman Empire expanded into the Balkans and the Caucasus, new influences streamed into its existing musical traditions. Local rhythms and instruments gracefully intertwined with Ottoman practices, symbolizing a continuous evolution borne of cultural exchange. Ottoman musicians were celebrated for their improvisational prowess, showcasing extended sections of taksim — an art form wherein the musician freely expressed themselves within a given makam. This improvisational spirit exemplified the creative freedom inherent in the musical tradition, a legacy that would continue to thrive.

By the 17th century, not only were performances flourishing, but the theoretical underpinnings of music began to take shape in treatises discussing its connection to mathematics and cosmology. In this period, music emerged as more than just an artistic expression; it became a lens through which to explore the world.

The military bands, too, played a dual role, appearing not only in battles but also in ceremonial processions. Their music transformed into a projection of imperial power and unity, embodying the might and majesty of the Ottoman Empire. With each note, they crafted a narrative of strength, authority, and cultural richness — a soundscape that resonated far and wide.

In reflecting on the musical legacy of the Ottoman Empire, it becomes clear that it left behind a profound influence not only on neighboring regions but on the global music scene itself. The echoes of Ottoman musical traditions would seep into the fabric of the Balkans, the Caucasus, and the Middle East, as local musicians embraced and adapted Ottoman styles to their unique contexts.

Today, as the world grapples with the complexities of cultural exchange and identity, the legacy of the Ottoman Empire serves as a poignant reminder of the power of music to transcend boundaries. It asks us to consider how the rivalries in sound — between dastgah and makam, tradition and innovation — continue to shape our understanding of culture.

In imagining the rich aural tapestries created over centuries, one must wonder: what melodies linger in the air, waiting to be rediscovered in our own lives? What insights might we glean when we dive deep into the symphonies of history? The legacy of sound remains a mirror reflecting not only the past but the ever-unfolding possibilities of our shared human experience.

Highlights

  • In the 16th century, Ottoman court music was dominated by the makam system, a modal framework for melody that structured both instrumental and vocal performance, with hundreds of distinct makams in circulation by the late 1700s. - By the late 1500s, Ottoman military bands (mehterân) used a distinctive combination of percussion (kös, davul, zil), wind (zurna), and brass instruments, creating a sound that both intimidated and fascinated European armies. - In 1565, during the visit of French King Charles IX to Bayonne, Ottoman Turks were portrayed in pageants and tournaments as exotic “Others,” reflecting European anxieties about Ottoman military and cultural power. - Ottoman coffee houses, especially the Amane type, became hubs for musical subcultures in the 17th and 18th centuries, where musicians performed for diverse audiences and social classes, often blending folk and classical styles. - The Ottoman–Safavid frontier saw frequent musical exchange, with ashugh bards (poet-musicians) traveling between empires, adapting dastgah (Persian modal system) and makam (Ottoman modal system) to local tastes and political contexts. - In the late 17th century, Ottoman court musicians began to incorporate elements from Central Asian and Balkan traditions, reflecting the empire’s vast geographic reach and cosmopolitan tastes. - By the 1700s, Ottoman architecture and music were conceptually linked: builders and musicians shared an understanding of geometry and harmony, with certain architectural tools and musical instruments designed to produce “harmonious” sounds and forms. - Ottoman military bands influenced European composers, who began imitating the “Turkish” style in orchestral works by the late 1700s, notably in the music of Mozart and Haydn. - In the 1600s, Ottoman musicians used a variety of stringed instruments, including the tanbur, ud, and kemençe, alongside wind instruments like the ney and zurna, and percussion such as the def and darbuka. - Ottoman musical manuscripts from the 16th and 17th centuries show detailed notation for both makam and usul (rhythmic cycles), with some pieces specifying exact tempo and ornamentation. - The Ottoman court maintained a hierarchy of musicians, with the chief musician (hekimbaşı) overseeing performances and training, and specialized ensembles for religious, military, and secular occasions. - In the 1700s, Ottoman musicians began to experiment with polyphony, though the dominant tradition remained monophonic, with a single melodic line supported by rhythmic accompaniment. - Ottoman musicians often performed in public spaces such as mosques, coffee houses, and marketplaces, as well as in private homes and courtly settings, reflecting the social diversity of musical life. - The Ottoman Empire’s expansion into the Balkans and the Caucasus brought new musical influences, including the incorporation of local rhythms and instruments into Ottoman performance practice. - Ottoman musicians were known for their improvisational skills, with performances often featuring extended sections of taksim (improvisation) within a given makam. - In the 17th century, Ottoman musicians began to document their theories in treatises, discussing the relationship between music, mathematics, and cosmology. - Ottoman military bands were deployed not only in battle but also in ceremonial processions, where their music served to project imperial power and unity. - The Ottoman court employed musicians from diverse ethnic backgrounds, including Greeks, Armenians, Jews, and Turks, reflecting the empire’s multicultural character. - Ottoman musicians often performed in ensembles of 10–20 players, with specific roles for each instrument and musician, creating a rich and layered sound. - The Ottoman Empire’s musical traditions influenced neighboring regions, including the Balkans, the Caucasus, and the Middle East, with local musicians adapting Ottoman styles to their own contexts.

Sources

  1. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0268416009007048/type/journal_article
  2. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/428993
  3. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/080c6ccc59561ff9b2d81aa94e3ea3a7275a1e44
  4. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/340842fa8e104c24e01b49ea8ee9ee20c4a58162
  5. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.9460447.0011.104
  6. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d9821319f61cffd551d8b76a25b03e900750ff96
  7. http://choicereviews.org/review/10.5860/CHOICE.48-4901
  8. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2c6bf1e81d552153a997e96522ef36726bca0414
  9. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0395264900036696/type/journal_article
  10. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/590792cc0f3e8d192c1f8acbc5324ac87d2dcfee