Select an episode
Not playing

Old Streets, New Towers

Hutongs and lilongs face wrecking balls, then careful revamps. Artists and shopkeepers fight for memory as malls and CBDs rise - revealing what China chooses to save.

Episode Narrative

In the early 1990s, a transformation began to unfold across China, one that would change the landscape of its cities forever. In 1992, the nation embarked on a journey of unprecedented urban expansion. Over the next two decades, China's urban land area would grow nearly fivefold. This evolution was not merely a series of changes on a map; it was a seismic shift in how millions of people lived, worked, and interacted. By 2015, the average annual growth rate of urban land reached an astonishing 8.10%, nearly two and a half times the global average. What drove this rapid transformation was the conversion of cropland into urban landscapes, a poignant reflection of the tension between agricultural heritage and modern aspirations.

Urbanization in China became a phenomenon of striking scale. By 2010, reports indicated that over 95% of Chinese cities were experiencing growth in their urban built-up areas. This was especially true for megacities hosting populations between five and ten million. The surge in urbanization represented not just a statistical blip but a profound change in the fabric of Chinese society. Families relocated from the countryside to bustling urban centers in search of better opportunities, spurred on by both necessity and aspiration.

Zhejiang Province became an emblematic case study in this narrative. Between 1990 and 2020, urban land in the province expanded by approximately 6,900 square kilometers while agricultural land dwindled by over 4,300 square kilometers. This transformation exemplified the trade-offs inherent in rapid urban expansion — a difficult balancing act between meeting the housing demands of an urbanizing population and preserving the agricultural landscapes that had sustained generations. In this tug-of-war, the scars of loss ran deep, marking the end of an era.

As 2015 approached, China's urbanization rate reached 58.58%. Yet, this figure hid complexities beneath the surface. The registered urban population lagged behind, revealing discrepancies between official statistics and the lived experiences of millions. A dual household registration system, known as hukou, hindered the ability of many migrants to access urban services and benefits, exemplifying the disparities woven into the fabric of this rapidly modernizing society.

The narrative of urban expansion was not without its complications. Following the economic surge of the early 2000s, a global financial crisis brought a moment of pause. China’s coastal zones, which had been pivotal to national economic strategies, experienced notable slowdowns. Yet by 2020, the urbanization rate climbed to 63.9%. This figure, however, masked a telling trend; since 2015, the annual rate of change had begun to decline, indicating a gradual slowdown in urban growth.

During this time, migration patterns shifted. By 2015, the influx of migrants into urban areas peaked, only to experience a slow decline in the years that followed. This ebbing tide affected the delicate balance of urban dynamics, presenting challenges in infrastructure development and city planning. Cities that had surged with promise found themselves grappling with new realities that required adaptiveness and foresight.

As of 2018, China claimed nearly one-fifth of the world’s megacities, underscoring its role as a significant player in global urban development. The expansion of urban land in six major cities from 2000 to 2018 illustrated a landscape marked by rapid land conversion. Significant environmental impacts emerged as a backdrop to this growth, forcing city planners and residents alike to confront tough questions about sustainability and livability.

By 2020, while the quality of urbanization had improved — more citizens gained access to services and infrastructure — substantial regional disparities became apparent. Eastern coastal regions frequently outpaced their western counterparts, creating further divisions in access to opportunities and resources. This uneven growth prompted a deeper look into the spatio-temporal evolution of urbanization, especially in central China from 2013 to 2021. The push for sustainable development became a clarion call, emphasizing the need for a balanced approach that took into account both the environment and the well-being of urban populations.

Innovative measures were introduced to address these complexities. Utilizing nighttime luminosity data provided valuable insights into urban expansion and the velocity of urbanization. Cities became vibrant nodes of activity, but along with this vibrancy came the pressing need for effective management and planning. The transformation of traditional urban spaces like Beijing’s hutongs and Shanghai’s lilongs into commercial and residential areas highlighted the conflicts that arose from modernization. Historical neighborhoods, once teeming with cultural significance, faced the threat of erasure as developers paved the way for new commercial interests.

The Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region exemplified significant urban sprawl and evolving land-use efficiency. From 2000 to 2020, major shifts occurred, creating new products that reflected changing urban dynamics. Looking south, the Yangtze River Delta emerged as a critical area of urban growth, its rapid land urbanization unfolding as a complex narrative woven with both opportunity and risk. Advanced geospatial techniques allowed researchers to dissect this dynamic landscape, offering insights into the numerous factors influencing urbanization.

In 2016, the Healthy Cities initiative sought to reshape urban health, advocating for public participation and cross-sectoral collaboration. This marked a shift toward a more inclusive approach to urban development, aiming to integrate not just the physical but also the social health of communities. The spatial distribution of population and GDP during this period led to the emergence of a new structural framework: a “1 + 4 + 11” model. This indicated one national-level area, four regional-level areas, and eleven local regionally aggregated areas, each presenting varying degrees of growth and potential.

New urbanization policies were implemented, aiming to inject vitality and sustainability into emerging urban agglomerations. Yet, the status of these efforts was not static, shifting in response to evolving political, economic, and social landscapes. The narrative of urbanization in China couldn’t be told in isolation; it required understanding the interdependent dynamics of policy and place, people and progress.

Amid these sweeping changes, a mosaic of human stories emerged, each reflecting the hopes and dreams of those navigating this transformative era. The struggle between the old streets and new towers raged on, teetering between preservation and progress. Artists and shopkeepers affiliated with Beijing’s hutongs fought to maintain a cultural memory that was at risk of fading away amid glittering shopping malls and commercial conglomerates. Their voices became a reminder of what was at stake: a living history being woven into the fabric of an ever-evolving urban identity.

As we reflect on this epoch of rapid urbanization, we are left with a powerful question: what will define the urban landscapes of tomorrow? In a world where the old streets serve as a mirror to the past and the new towers symbolize the future, the balance between heritage and modernity remains precarious. Each decision, every policy, and every shift in population tells a story of transformation. Old streets may yield to new towers, but the echoes of the past will always shape the cityscapes of our future. As we stand at this urban crossroads, we must consider how to navigate the complexities of growth, sustainability, and identity in a world that is continually reshaping itself.

Highlights

  • In 1992, China’s urban land area began a dramatic expansion, increasing nearly fivefold by 2015, with an average annual growth rate of 8.10%, almost 2.5 times the global average, primarily by converting cropland into urban land. - By 2010, more than 95% of Chinese cities experienced growth in urban built-up areas, especially megacities with populations between 5 and 10 million, highlighting the scale and speed of urbanization. - Between 1990 and 2020, Zhejiang Province saw urban land grow by about 6899.59 km² (6.6%), while agricultural land decreased by 4320.68 km² (4.19%), reflecting the trade-offs between urban expansion and farmland loss. - In 2015, China’s urbanization rate (urban population/total population) reached 58.58%, but the registered population urbanization rate lagged, revealing a gap between official statistics and actual urban residency. - The mismatch between population urbanization and land urbanization increased from central, eastern, and northeastern regions to western regions, largely due to China’s dual household registration (hukou) and land systems. - Urban land expansion in China’s coastal zone since 2000 was influenced by national economic strategies and regional development plans, with notable slowdowns during the global financial crisis. - By 2020, China’s urbanization rate had risen to 63.9%, but the annual rate of change had been declining since 2015, indicating a slowdown in the pace of urbanization. - The migration population peaked in 2015 and has been slowly decreasing, affecting the dynamics of urban growth and the demand for urban infrastructure. - In 2018, China accounted for nearly one-fifth of the world’s megacities, underscoring its global significance in urban development. - The expansion of urban land in China’s six megacities from 2000 to 2018 was characterized by rapid land conversion, changes in urban form, and significant environmental impacts. - By 2020, the urbanization quality in China had improved, but there were significant regional differences, with eastern regions generally outpacing western regions. - The spatial-temporal evolution of urbanization in central China from 2013 to 2021 showed a continuous increase in the level of new urbanization, with regional differences and a growing emphasis on sustainable development. - The use of nighttime luminosity data to estimate the velocity of urbanization in China revealed that urban population and built-up land expanded rapidly, creating complex planning and management challenges. - The transformation of hutongs and lilongs in Beijing and Shanghai into commercial and residential spaces has been a contentious issue, with artists and shopkeepers fighting to preserve cultural memory as malls and CBDs rise. - The Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region saw significant urban sprawl and changes in land-use efficiency from 2000 to 2020, with the creation of new built-up area products and functional urban boundaries. - The Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration experienced rapid land urbanization, with spatial differentiation and influencing factors analyzed using advanced geospatial techniques. - The Healthy Cities initiative in China, launched in 2016, identified areas for improvement in urban health, public participation, and intersectoral collaboration, reflecting a shift towards more holistic urban development. - The spatial distribution of population and GDP in China’s urbanization process has led to the formation of a “1 + 4 + 11” structure, with one national-level, four regional-level, and eleven local regionally aggregated areas of population and GDP. - The new urbanization policies implemented in China’s urban agglomerations have had a positive influence on sustainable urbanization, but the status is not static and changes with different policies. - The use of multi-source data, including remote sensing images and socio-economic data, has enabled a more comprehensive understanding of the spatio-temporal evolution and driving factors of urbanization in central China.

Sources

  1. https://invergejournals.com/index.php/ijss/article/view/146
  2. https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-024-04752-w
  3. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10064-018-1278-6
  4. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1746-1049.1995.tb00711.x
  5. https://www.scirp.org/journal/doi.aspx?doi=10.4236/me.2020.114072
  6. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41538-018-0012-x
  7. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fbefa761418b8fb2cbee7dfb7390dec68966f569
  8. https://academic.oup.com/aepp/article-lookup/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9353.2009.01471.x
  9. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8d2d95d0c19f99e1e90e13319ac54e60bbce764c
  10. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/23eb84ce7e9b149c7eb04b4a08d1ce77da2214ea