Select an episode
Not playing

Common Prosperity in Concrete

Xi's drive reins in property and tech, boosts public rentals, and funds transit over vanity towers. Anti-corruption trims graft-prone projects. Hukou reforms inch forward as cities chase fairer services.

Episode Narrative

In the heart of a nation defined by its intricate tapestry of history and culture lies a story of transformation. Since the early 1990s, China has embarked on a monumental journey of urbanization, a journey marked by explosive growth and profound challenges. As the sun rose on this new chapter in 1992, the landscape of China began to shift dramatically. Over the next two decades, the country's urban land area expanded nearly fivefold. This staggering average annual growth rate of 8.1 percent was not merely a statistical anomaly; it was about 2.5 times the global average. The cost of this rapid transformation was steep — 33,100 square kilometers of precious cropland, transformed forever, accounting for over half of the total urban expansion.

Imagine standing atop a hill overlooking what was once fertile land, now a sprawling cityscape. The skyline is dotted with gleaming towers, while below, the hum of construction echoes the relentless pursuit of progress. Yet, this achievement also came at a cost, as the soil that had nourished generations began to fade beneath layers of steel and concrete.

By the end of the first decade of the new millennium, China had become home to six of the world's most colossal megacities — Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Tianjin, and Chongqing. Together, they accounted for nearly one-fifth of all megacities on the planet. These urban giants expanded rapidly, but not without consequence. The environmental impacts became increasingly evident, with air pollution thickening in the atmosphere and the urban heat island effect altering the climate within city borders. Satellite images captured the stark contrast of growth — a visual record of humanity's triumph and tragedy.

As cities grew, the number of people they could accommodate seemed to become a secondary concern. During the years between 2010 and 2020, even as urban areas burgeoned, the concentration of people living in them did not fundamentally shift. This paradox led to the phenomenon of "ghost cities," sprawling neighborhoods and districts constructed with the hope of new life, yet standing eerily quiet, filled with underutilized infrastructure and abandoned dreams. The mismatch between urban land growth and actual population figures was stark; the relentlessly rising skyline belied the emptiness within.

By 2013, as central China's 80 prefecture-level cities strove to establish a new urbanization index, the figures rose from 0.1562 to 0.2557. This increase signaled improvements across various sectors: population, economy, society, space, and ecology. However, as promising as these numbers appeared, stark regional disparities persisted. This was a nation striving for balance, yet the scales tipped unevenly.

At the heart of this endeavor was an ambitious policy — new urbanization, a people-centered vision aimed at granting urban hukou, or household registration, to countless migrant workers. These individuals, drawn to the promise of city life, often found themselves lingering outside the doors of opportunity. The goal was clear: grant access to education, healthcare, and housing. Yet, the actual implementation was often marred by delays and obstacles.

In 2015, the concept of ecological urbanization emerged as a beacon of hope — a vision promising consistent, balanced development throughout China. Yet, alongside this ambition, cultural urbanization struggled to gain ground, leaving economic parameters uneven. Innovation, deemed the most significant barrier to sustainable growth, hung like a shadow over the nation's aspirations.

Fast forward to the years between 2016 and 2020, and China’s urbanization rate climbed from 57.4 percent to 63.9 percent, suggesting a burgeoning connection between its inhabitants and their surroundings. However, the annual rate of increase began to slow, hinting at a maturing urban landscape. The fleeting rush of growth had become a steady rhythm, it seemed, allowing a more reflective phase to emerge.

Yet, not all were able to share in the prosperity woven into China’s urban fabric. By 2020, the reality of the hukou system became painfully clear. Although the urbanization rate based on permanent population reached 58.58 percent, a staggering 300 million rural migrants remained trapped outside the benefits of urban citizenship. They faced hurdles in accessing public services, a stark reminder that even amidst towering structures and glossy highways, the gap between aspiration and reality remained wide.

In Zhejiang Province, between 1990 and 2020, urban land experienced a noteworthy increase of nearly 6,900 square kilometers. What accompanied this change — a remarkable decline in agricultural land — signified the patterns of sacrifice all too frequently glossed over in the narrative of progress. The search for development became a double-edged sword, as vast tracts of farmland yielded to the pressures of urban sprawl.

During the same period, the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region witnessed dynamic urban expansion influenced heavily by national economic strategies. These ambitious plans often bore notable fruits, yet they also cultivated environmental stress that could not be ignored. The tales of rapid growth came with stories of land degradation, air quality deterioration, and the nuanced interplay of economic advancement versus ecological distress.

As the 2010s unfurled, the national focus sharpened onto the people. The new urbanization policy concentrated on centering development around human needs rather than mere infrastructure. Despite the ambitious framework, the gradual and uneven implementation echoed the slow, careful steps of a giant awakening from slumber, hesitant yet hopeful.

In 2021, a monumental shift began. President Xi Jinping’s “common prosperity” campaign sought to reimagine infrastructure priorities. No longer would vanity projects and property speculation define growth. Instead, a focus on public rental housing and mass transit began to take the forefront. The idea of common prosperity resonated across the landscape, attempting to bridge growing divides and draw all citizens into the fold of development.

As China moved deeper into the 2020s, the narrative of urbanization continued to evolve. The development of the tertiary sector blossomed, heavily influenced by urbanization and rising living standards. Yet, as the pace of change accelerated, urbanization quality crept forward at a mere 11.21 percent — a sobering reminder of the need for balance between quantity and livability.

Nighttime lights began to paint a vivid picture of urbanization’s velocity, revealing disparities between coastal provinces, megacities, and their inland counterparts. While some regions thrived under the glow of bright cityscapes, others remained shrouded in shadows, waiting for their moment to shine.

Chongqing, a paragon of expansive urbanization, showcased notable growth both in urban land and population. Yet, it mirrored the profound challenges of integrating rural migrants — an ongoing battle against spatiotemporal heterogeneity, with the rural-urban divide often insistent and unyielding.

As the decade drew on, a critical issue emerged: the mismatch between land urbanization, the physical expansion of urban spaces, and population urbanization, which refers to the process of citizenization. The realities of the dual hukou and land systems bred significant disparities, particularly in western regions, where growth stagnated while demand simmered.

In an era marked by uncertainty, the COVID-19 pandemic arrived as an unexpected storm, temporarily halting urbanization and migration trends. Yet, amidst the chaos, cities emerged as engines of economic recovery, their resilience tested and renewed focus on public health infrastructure taking root.

In the years that followed, as policies continued to evolve, the emphasis on sustainable urbanization grew stronger. The challenges of inequality and access to services persisted, but evidence emerged that new urbanization policies held the power to forge paths toward balanced and environmentally conscious growth.

In the final reflection on this intricate journey, one is left to ponder a poignant question: Can a nation truly realize prosperity not just in concrete structures, but in the lives of those who inhabit them? As the urban skyline continues to rise, so too does the collective hope that beneath it lies a spirit of community and belonging, molding a future in which all can thrive. In the dance of shadows and lights across city streets, the promise of “common prosperity” beckons — a call to break the cycles of disparity and create a legacy built on equity and shared purpose.

Highlights

  • 1992–2015: China’s urban land area increased nearly fivefold, with an average annual growth rate of 8.1% — about 2.5 times the global average — primarily by converting 33,100 km² of cropland, which accounted for 54.67% of total urban expansion. (Visual: Animated map of urban sprawl overlaid on cropland loss.)
  • 2000–2018: China’s six megacities (Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Tianjin, Chongqing) accounted for nearly one-fifth of the world’s megacities, with urban land expanding rapidly and environmental impacts intensifying, including air pollution and heat island effects. (Visual: Side-by-side satellite images of city growth.)
  • 2010–2020: Despite rapid expansion of built-up areas, the concentration of China’s population in cities did not fundamentally change; urban expansion often outpaced population growth, leading to “ghost cities” and underutilized infrastructure. (Visual: Chart comparing urban land growth vs. population growth.)
  • 2013–2021: The average “new urbanization” index in central China’s 80 prefecture-level cities rose from 0.1562 to 0.2557, reflecting improvements in population, economy, society, space, and ecology, but with stark regional disparities. (Visual: Heatmap of urbanization quality by region.)
  • 2015: Only ecological urbanization showed high-quality, balanced development across China, while cultural urbanization lagged and economic urbanization was uneven, with innovation identified as the biggest barrier to sustainable urban growth. (Visual: Radar chart of urbanization dimensions.)
  • 2016–2020: China’s urbanization rate (urban population share) climbed from 57.4% to 63.9%, but the annual rate of increase slowed after 2015, signaling a maturing urban transition. (Visual: Line graph of urbanization rate over time.)
  • 2020: The urbanization rate based on permanent population reached 58.58%, but the hukou (household registration) system still left about 300 million rural migrants without full urban citizenship and access to public services. (Visual: Infographic on the “floating population.”)
  • 1990–2020: In Zhejiang Province, urban land grew by 6,899.59 km² (6.6% of the province), mainly at the expense of agricultural land, which decreased by 4,320.68 km² (4.19%). (Visual: Time-lapse land-use change map.)
  • 2000–2020: The Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region saw dynamic urban expansion, with spatial patterns heavily influenced by national economic strategies and regional development plans, leading to both economic growth and environmental stress. (Visual: Regional urban growth animation.)
  • 2010s: The “new urbanization” policy emphasized people-centered development, aiming to grant migrant workers urban hukou and equal access to education, healthcare, and housing, though implementation has been gradual and uneven. (Visual: Policy timeline with key milestones.)

Sources

  1. https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s43621-025-01320-8
  2. https://invergejournals.com/index.php/ijss/article/view/146
  3. https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10668-024-04752-w
  4. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10064-018-1278-6
  5. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1746-1049.1995.tb00711.x
  6. https://www.scirp.org/journal/doi.aspx?doi=10.4236/me.2020.114072
  7. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41538-018-0012-x
  8. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/fbefa761418b8fb2cbee7dfb7390dec68966f569
  9. https://academic.oup.com/aepp/article-lookup/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9353.2009.01471.x
  10. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8d2d95d0c19f99e1e90e13319ac54e60bbce764c