Select an episode
Not playing

Tehran’s ‘Axis of Resistance’

Iran’s velayat-e faqih birthed an ‘Axis of Resistance.’ From Hezbollah’s clinics to Iraqi PMF shrines, piety fused with paramilitary power. JCPOA diplomacy met a Supreme Leader’s nuclear ‘red lines,’ while Soleimani became martyr and myth.

Episode Narrative

In the late 20th century, an unsettling dawn broke over the Middle East, forever altering its trajectory. In the aftermath of the Gulf War in 1991, Iran seized the opportunity to consolidate its influence across the region. This moment was not merely a chance for politics; it was the beginning of a profound reconfiguration of allegiances and power dynamics. The seeds of what would soon be dubbed the "Axis of Resistance" were being sown, a term that encapsulated the alliance of states and non-state actors opposing Western intervention and influence. It was an ambitious vision crafted by a country yearning for regional hegemony, with its ideology rooted deep within the concept of velayat-e faqih — the guardianship of the jurist.

As the 1990s progressed, Iran's political landscape evolved sharply under the weight of this doctrine. The principle of velayat-e faqih became not just a theoretical framework, but a powerful tool that molded the Iranian state’s approach to governance and foreign policy. It posited that ultimate authority resided with Islamic jurists, creating a system that emphasized not only the centrality of religion in governance but also the responsibilities of Iran toward the broader Muslim community. As Iran began to articulate its vision for the region, it positioned itself as a defender of oppressed peoples, particularly the Shia populations in neighboring states, who yearned for strength and connection amid a hostile geopolitical environment.

In 2003, a seismic shift occurred: the United States invaded Iraq. This incursion created a chaotic vacuum that Iran adeptly exploited. As the coalition forces toppled Saddam Hussein’s regime, Iran saw an opportunity to extend its reach by backing Shia militias and political factions. The power shift allowed Iranian influence to seep into the heart of Iraq. The landscape transformed; what had once been a site of enmity became a breeding ground for Iranian proxies. Organizations like the Mahdi Army began to receive support from Tehran, turning the vacuum into a conduit of Iranian ideology and military might.

By 2005, the geopolitical chessboard had continued to advance. Hezbollah, a militant group rooted in Lebanon, emerged as a significant political player under Iran’s patronage. The group’s consolidation of power not only expressed Iran’s strategic interests but also reshaped Lebanese politics. Hezbollah became a proxy for Iran’s ambitions, demonstrating military capabilities that would be tested soon. The Lebanon War in 2006 showcased this alliance's depth, highlighting Hezbollah's role in confronting Israel. For many, the war was a confirmation of Iran’s resolve, reinforcing its reputation as a defender against perceived aggressors and cementing its influence in the Levant.

The Arab Spring that erupted in 2011 would further complicate the regional landscape. As authoritarian regimes faltered and the specter of chaos spread, Iran sought to navigate this burgeoning instability to strengthen its alliances. It invested heavily in its relationships with groups like Hamas and the Syrian government, activating a network that sought to leverage unrest for its ideological gain. The fight for survival became synonymous with the fight for influence.

From 2014 to 2018, the rise and subsequent downfall of the Islamic State added a turbulent layer to the already complex geopolitics of the region. In Iraq and Syria, amidst the chaos of civil war, Iran's involvement intensified. It offered military support and strategic leadership, positioning itself as a crucial actor in the fight against ISIS. The Popular Mobilization Forces, comprised largely of Iranian-backed militia, became instrumental not only in combating terrorist threats but also in entrenching Iranian influence in a post-ISIS landscape.

In 2015, a fleeting moment of hope briefly emerged on the horizon with the signing of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, or JCPOA. This landmark agreement was intended to curb Iran’s nuclear ambitions in exchange for sanctions relief, suggesting a potential for détente between Iran and Western powers. Yet the tenuous calm did not last. Tensions simmered beneath the surface, and the fundamental issues surrounding Iran's regional aspirations remained unaddressed. By 2019, the United States had withdrawn from the JCPOA, and a new wave of economic sanctions was unleashed, bringing the already strained relations to a breaking point.

2020 proved to be a pivotal year for Iranian-American relations. The assassination of General Qasem Soleimani, the head of Iran's Quds Force, sent shockwaves through the region, igniting further animosity and solidifying Soleimani's martyrdom in the eyes of many Iranians. This event not only escalated U.S.-Iran tensions but also reinforced Iran's resolve to pursue its objectives. The assassination marked a turning point, as Iran doubled down on the strategy of leveraging its Axis of Resistance to counter perceived threats.

In the ensuing years, the Axis of Resistance expanded its footprint. With alliances firmly established in Iraq, Lebanon, Syria, and Yemen, Iran leveraged both military power and ideological support to create a robust antidote to rival powers. The Popular Mobilization Forces in Iraq became a critical component of this strategy, seamlessly blending military capability with religious fervor.

The landscape continually evolved, becoming especially fraught by 2022. Tensions between Iran and Israel heightened, particularly in strategic theaters like the Red Sea and Eastern Africa. The two nations jostled for influence, each seeking to assert its power amid competing ambitions. This region, rich in both resources and ideological stakes, became a battleground where diplomacy and warfare intertwined.

Fast forward to 2023, where Iran's nuclear program remained at the forefront of international diplomacy. As negotiations persisted, underlying tensions erupted repeatedly, echoing a legacy of mistrust that resisted resolution. The challenges Iran faced from within, combined with external pressures, did little to weaken the resolve of its Axis of Resistance. The groups under Iran's umbrella stood firm amidst the storm, drawing strength from a shared ideology that transcended borders.

The world was shifting in surprising, unsettling ways. By 2024, Europe experienced a rise in radical right-wing ideologies, influencing not just internal politics but also extending ripples into the Middle East. The changing political dynamics could potentially alter alliances in ways that were yet to be understood.

As we drew closer to 2025, the geopolitical chess game continued in earnest. The U.S. and China vied for influence in the Middle East, each seeking to secure strategic partnerships and economic corridors against the backdrop of a complex regional tapestry. Amidst this competition, Iran deepened its ties with Russia and China, effectively fortifying itself against Western encroachments.

Even as the echoes of the Ukrainian conflict reached across the globe, reshaping foreign policy paradigms, the Middle East remained a focal point for ambitions and rivalries. With its strategic resources and pivotal location, the region stood at a crossroads of power.

Tehran's Axis of Resistance, born from moments of conflict and crisis, transformed into a formidable alignment that continues to exert influence in the 21st century. But as history consistently shows, all alliances face challenges. The human stories, the struggles, the aspirations, and the fears tied into this ever-evolving saga reflect a fundamental truth: the ground is laden with conflicts that often mask deeper questions about identity, belonging, and justice.

What lies ahead for this enduring coalition? Will it weather the increasing pressures and challenges tightening like a noose around its ambitions? As the Middle East continues to vibrate with the force of geopolitical ambitions, these questions remain crucial as we navigate this intricate, high-stakes theater of power where the personal and the political collide. The greater narrative of the Axis of Resistance is still being written, and its impact will ripple through generations yet to come.

Highlights

  • 1991: Following the Gulf War, Iran began to consolidate its influence in the Middle East, laying groundwork for what would become known as the "Axis of Resistance".
  • 1990s: The concept of velayat-e faqih (guardianship of the jurist) solidified in Iran, shaping its political and ideological stance in the region.
  • 2003: The US invasion of Iraq created a power vacuum that Iran exploited to expand its influence, particularly through Shia militias.
  • 2005: Hezbollah, a key ally of Iran, became a significant political force in Lebanon, furthering Iran's regional influence.
  • 2006: The Lebanon War highlighted Hezbollah's military capabilities and its role as a proxy for Iran.
  • 2011: The Arab Spring led to increased instability in the Middle East, allowing Iran to strengthen its alliances with groups like Hamas and the Syrian government.
  • 2014-2018: The rise and fall of the Islamic State (IS) in Iraq and Syria led to increased Iranian involvement in both countries, solidifying its position in the region.
  • 2015: The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) was signed, temporarily easing tensions between Iran and Western powers, but Iran's nuclear ambitions remained a point of contention.
  • 2019: The US withdrawal from the JCPOA and subsequent sanctions heightened tensions, with Iran's Supreme Leader setting "red lines" for nuclear negotiations.
  • 2020: The assassination of General Qasem Soleimani by the US marked a significant escalation in US-Iran tensions and cemented Soleimani's status as a martyr in Iran.

Sources

  1. https://ipj.uomustansiriyah.edu.iq/index.php/political/article/view/418
  2. https://brill.com/view/journals/melg/17/2/article-p199_003.xml
  3. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/mepo.12811
  4. https://ipj.uomustansiriyah.edu.iq/index.php/political/article/view/458
  5. https://visnyk-psp.kpi.ua/article/view/337626
  6. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0020743800056415/type/journal_article
  7. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0020743800023631/type/journal_article
  8. http://choicereviews.org/review/10.5860/CHOICE.29-2904
  9. https://journalpsa.com.pk/index.php/JPSA/article/view/132
  10. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/25765949.2025.2480007