Select an episode
Not playing

Syria, Sliced and Shared: Expanding Frontlines

Rebels, regime, Kurds, ISIS — then Russia, Iran, Turkey, and the US. We map how enclaves expand and shrink, from Aleppo sieges to Kurdish self‑rule. A baker in Idlib and a Russian air controller live the war of maps.

Episode Narrative

In the historical tapestry of the Middle East, the year 1991 marks not just a date, but a transformative moment. With the collapse of the Soviet Union and the conclusion of the Cold War, the United States found itself standing at a new crossroads. This pivotal shift prompted a reevaluation of American foreign policy, particularly in the Middle East. The aim was clear: to foster a regional order based on Arab-Israeli peace, Gulf security, and the relentless pursuit of counterterrorism. This strategic pivot would shape U.S. interventions for decades, laying the groundwork for future conflicts that rippled throughout the region.

The Gulf War, known as Operation Desert Storm, erupted later that same year. A coalition led by the United States sprung into action, expelling Iraqi forces from Kuwait. This decisive military operation didn't merely restore a nation; it reaffirmed the United States’ dominance in the Gulf. The U.S. positioned itself as the protector of vital oil supplies, an assertion that would influence interventions for years to come. These conflicts established a pattern, a method through which the U.S. would navigate a tumultuous landscape that was often as unpredictable as it was complex.

Fast forward to 2003, and the Middle East found itself embroiled in new chaos. The U.S. invasion of Iraq resulted in the toppling of Saddam Hussein’s regime. But the aftermath proved to be a catalyst for a prolonged insurgency and sectarian violence that would soon spiral beyond Iraq's borders. It was within this void that ISIS would rise, taking advantage of the instability to assert control over significant territories in both Iraq and Syria. These developments not only destabilized the Levant; they also drew in a medley of regional and global powers, each seeking to redefine their interests within a collapsing order.

The year 2011 saw the fires of the Arab Spring ignite across the region. Peaceful protests erupted in Syria against President Bashar al-Assad's government, demanding change and reform. Yet what began as cries for liberty quickly escalated into a brutal civil war. The landscape of Syria fragmented before our eyes, splintering into zones controlled by the government, rebels, Kurdish forces, and jihadists. Each group began a struggle for power, identity, and survival. In this whirlwind of strife, hope and despair intertwined like a tempest.

From 2012 to 2016, the Syrian city of Aleppo emerged as a poignant symbol of the war's brutality. The city was subjected to relentless siege, aerial bombardment, and street fighting, dramatically showcasing the costs of war. By late 2016, after years of suffering, government forces, bolstered by Russian airpower and Iranian militias, had recaptured Aleppo. This moment marked a significant turning point, emphasizing not only the resilience of Assad's regime but also the growth of Russian and Iranian influence within the region — a development that would reverberate for years to come.

In 2014, ISIS declared a caliphate over vast areas of Syria and Iraq, gaining control of major cities such as Mosul and Raqqa. The group established a regime marked by terror; public executions, slavery, and the wholesale destruction of cultural heritage became their calling cards. This wasn't merely a local phenomenon but an alarming example of how non-state actors could wield power and influence over vast territories. For millions, it symbolized the descent into a dark age of violence and fear.

But hope remained alive amidst the chaos. From 2014 to 2018, a U.S.-led coalition, along with local partners like the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces, worked tirelessly to roll back the territorial gains made by ISIS. The liberation of Raqqa in 2017 was a monumental victory, culminating in the group's final defeat in Baghuz two years later. These victories, however, did not equate to peace. Instead, they served as a testament to the complexities entwined in the Syrian conflict and the broader geopolitical issues at play.

In 2015, Russia made its bold move by launching a direct military intervention in Syria. With airpower, special forces, and private military contractors, Moscow aimed to prop up the Assad regime and re-establish itself as a major power broker in the Middle East after decades of retreat. This new geopolitical dynamic added another layer of complexity to an already convoluted situation. The balance of power was shifting, and with it came a reconfiguration of alliances.

The following year, Turkey launched Operation Euphrates Shield, boldly invading northern Syria to thwart Kurdish territorial expansion along its border. This operation created a buffer zone and underscored the crucial role of regional powers in the ongoing fight for control within Syria. The ensuing conflicts blurred national borders and exposed the fragility of alliances. In this ever-changing landscape, vulnerability became the order of the day.

In late 2018, the United States announced the withdrawal of troops from northern Syria. This decision heralded a Turkish offensive against Kurdish forces, leading to a swift reshuffling of control in the northeast. For the Kurdish people, it was a stark reminder of the volatility of their situation and the precarious nature of their hard-won self-rule. The implications were profound, shaking the foundations upon which many had built their hopes for the future.

The year 2019 saw the assassination of Iranian Quds Force commander Qasem Soleimani in Baghdad by the Trump administration, triggering an escalation of tensions between the U.S. and Iran. The following year, both parties engaged in unprecedented direct strikes on each other’s territories. What had begun as a localized conflict in Syria expanded to engulf the entire region, laying bare the volatility of the geopolitical chessboard.

Meanwhile, the decade marched on, and in 2020, Israel normalized relations with the UAE and Bahrain through the Abraham Accords. This diplomatic maneuver shifted regional alliances, reshaping the geopolitical map and diminishing Arab solidarity with the Palestinian cause. Within the same year, the COVID-19 pandemic swept through the Middle East, exacerbating existing economic crises, straining healthcare systems, and intensifying inequalities. It became a new front in the ongoing blame game among global powers, each seeking to assert its narrative amidst the chaos.

As 2021 unfolded, Syria found itself in a state of collapse. The economy disintegrated, with the Syrian pound losing most of its value. Daily life became a struggle for civilians, marked by widespread poverty, fuel shortages, and a constant reliance on aid convoys. The conflict had redefined the very fabric of society, and human life had become a calculated risk amid checkpoints, sieges, and aerial bombardments.

In 2022, the Russian invasion of Ukraine proved to be a double-edged sword. While it diverted global attention and resources away from the calamities of Syria, it also highlighted the interconnectedness of Middle Eastern conflicts with larger great power rivalries. Syria remained a critical node in Russia’s strategic depth, underpinning the broader stakes of international politics.

By 2023, the shadow war between Iran and Israel transcended the bounds of national borders, showcasing a balance of terror that expanded conflict beyond expectation. The Assad regime, now backed by Russian and Iranian forces, gradually reasserted control over major cities. Yet, large swathes of the country remained outside the regime's reach, governed instead by rebels, jihadists, or Kurdish-led administrations. It painted a fragmented picture of a nation in crisis.

The humanitarian situation in Syria remained dire in 2024. Over 13 million people were displaced, representing nearly half the pre-war population. Millions depended on cross-border aid deliveries just to survive. Animated maps could vividly depict the movement of people as they sought refuge, illustrating a nation marked by displacement and turmoil. The daily lives of civilians in Idlib, the last major rebel-held enclave, were punctuated by frequent airstrikes, makeshift schools, and a vibrant, albeit precarious, civil society. Here, bakers, teachers, and doctors emerged as unsung heroes, serving as symbols of resilience amid a landscape fraught with scarcity.

As we entered 2025, the Syrian conflict reached its 14th year with no political resolution in sight. The country remained a tapestry of disparate zones of influence, each controlled by different entities — regime forces, the Turkish military, Kurdish groups, and jihadists. Syria had become a “sliced and shared” entity, a microcosm reflecting the wider expansions and contractions of the Middle East’s identity and conflicts.

This ongoing struggle reveals deep truths about humanity’s capacity for resilience in the face of unprecedented adversity. Yet it raises an unsettling question: will there ever be a day when Syria finds itself whole again, free from the storms of conflict, allowing its people to envision a brighter future? As the echoes of history resonate, we are left to ponder the fate of a nation forever marked by its trials.

Highlights

  • 1991: The collapse of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War prompted the United States to develop a new Middle East strategy, aiming to create a regional order based on Arab-Israeli peace, Gulf security, and counterterrorism — a shift that would shape interventions for decades.
  • 1991: The Gulf War (Operation Desert Storm) saw a U.S.-led coalition expel Iraqi forces from Kuwait, reasserting American military dominance in the Gulf and setting the stage for future U.S. interventions under the rubric of protecting vital oil supplies.
  • 2003: The U.S. invasion of Iraq toppled Saddam Hussein’s regime, triggering a prolonged insurgency, sectarian violence, and the eventual rise of ISIS — events that destabilized the entire Levant and drew in regional and global powers.
  • 2011: The Arab Spring uprisings spread to Syria, where peaceful protests against President Bashar al-Assad’s government escalated into a full-scale civil war, fragmenting the country into zones controlled by the regime, rebels, Kurds, and jihadists.
  • 2012–2016: The Syrian city of Aleppo became a symbol of the war’s brutality, enduring years of siege, aerial bombardment, and street fighting before government forces, backed by Russian airpower and Iranian militias, recaptured the city in late 2016 — a turning point that showcased the expansion of Russian and Iranian influence.
  • 2014: ISIS declared a caliphate spanning parts of Syria and Iraq, controlling major cities like Mosul and Raqqa, and instituting a regime of terror marked by public executions, slavery, and the destruction of cultural heritage — a dramatic example of non-state territorial expansion.
  • 2014–2018: The U.S.-led coalition and local partners, including Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), rolled back ISIS territorially, culminating in the liberation of Raqqa (2017) and the group’s final territorial defeat in Baghuz (2019).
  • 2015: Russia launched a direct military intervention in Syria, deploying airpower, special forces, and private military contractors to prop up the Assad regime — marking Moscow’s return as a major power broker in the Middle East after decades of retreat.
  • 2016: Turkey launched Operation Euphrates Shield, invading northern Syria to prevent Kurdish territorial expansion along its border, creating a buffer zone and highlighting the role of regional powers in carving up Syrian territory.
  • 2018: The U.S. announced the withdrawal of troops from northern Syria, leading to a Turkish offensive against Kurdish forces and the rapid reshuffling of control in the northeast — a moment that underscored the fragility of Kurdish self-rule and the volatility of alliances.

Sources

  1. https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004591
  2. http://choicereviews.org/review/10.5860/CHOICE.29-0015
  3. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/71faa4e940b896ee68b10320dc711ba967411f06
  4. https://pjia.com.pk/index.php/pjia/article/view/777
  5. http://www.emerald.com/reps/article/7/4/302-316/365723
  6. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8113167fc368bd3d903378e636e450536b9be2ef
  7. https://journal.equinoxpub.com/RST/article/view/27184
  8. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781119082316.ch9
  9. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dbbeaa02c32a84e73c3e931c4f5c8232d798854a
  10. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bdc6e97186f04bae32bf497e096bd546049e27d2