From Sofia to Zagreb: The Next Waves
Bulgaria and Romania enter in 2007; Croatia in 2013. Reforms tackle corruption and borders; Schengen and euro come later for some. Western Balkans queue with tough conditions. The promise of membership drives change — and tests patience.
Episode Narrative
From Sofia to Zagreb: The Next Waves
In the heart of Southeastern Europe, a seismic shift was unfolding. The year was 2007. Bulgaria and Romania stood at the cusp of a new era. With their accession to the European Union, they marked a significant expansion of the Union into a region filled with promise and challenges. These countries had weathered storms of political and economic upheaval, moving away from their communist pasts. Their journey into the EU was not merely a transition of borders on a map; it was a transformation of governance, society, and prospects.
The road to EU membership for both nations required extensive reforms. Governments were tasked to tackle corruption, strengthen their judicial systems, and secure borders. It was a monumental challenge, one that tested the resilience of their political fabric and public trust. However, even with their membership secured, Bulgaria and Romania faced hurdles. Both countries found themselves waiting to step into the Schengen Area, that symbol of European unity, and to join the eurozone, the currency that signifies deeper integration. This delay was more than administrative; it reflected lingering doubts about governance and economic stability.
As the clock ticked forward, the EU continued its expansion. In 2013, Croatia joined, becoming the 28th member. This accession was laden with rigorous negotiations focused on critical issues like rule of law and anti-corruption measures. Croatia's path illustrated the EU’s increasing emphasis on governance standards for new members. It was a dance of diplomacy, a negotiation shaped by both the hopes of a nation eager for belonging and the stringent conditions laid out by the Union.
This expanding tapestry of European nations transformed significantly over the decades. From 1991 to 2025, the nature of the EU’s enlargement policy evolved. It transitioned from a primarily economic gesture to a geopolitical strategy. The world watched as Russia, in 2014, annexed Crimea, and as the brutal war in Ukraine erupted in 2022. These events highlighted the urgent need for stability in the Western Balkans and renewed the EU’s interest in countries longing for a European future. Against this backdrop, Serbia, Montenegro, North Macedonia, and Albania remained in a precarious waiting room. They were candidates for EU membership, yet the conditions placed upon them — of rule of law, anti-corruption measures, and normalization of relations with neighbors — grew increasingly stringent. The enlargement policy that had initiated with hope now became a complex dance, filled with political nuances.
Reflecting on the post-2004 "big bang" enlargement, one could see how it reshaped the landscape. The accession of ten Central and Eastern European countries resulted in a startling increase of the EU's population by 28% and its surface area by 34%. This reshuffling required new mechanisms for integration and cohesion, as diverse political cultures converged under one umbrella. Each nation's unique identity added layers to the collective European narrative, yet also presented challenges of unity amidst diversity.
As these nations endeavored to align with the EU’s standards, transition agreements became a critical tool. During the significant expansions to the South and East, these agreements carefully balanced economic integration with the realities of migration. They temporarily restricted labor market access for new members, addressing concerns that the newfound freedom could entice mass migration and strain systems already under pressure. Over time, these restrictions were gradually lifted, culminating in full free movement rights, creating a more interconnected Europe by the 2010s.
Yet, despite the strides made, the narratives of Bulgaria and Romania remained unique. Both countries, despite becoming EU members, grappled with their status as they delayed joining the Schengen Area and adopting the euro. Their situation illuminated broader questions about governance and economic convergence within the European project. In stark contrast, Croatia conquered the final frontiers of membership by joining the Schengen Area and adopting the euro in 2023, completing a chapter in its journey toward European integration.
As the EU expanded, its geopolitical concerns shifted, especially against the backdrop of Russia's aggressive moves. The annexation of Crimea served as a catalyst that dramatically altered the EU’s foreign policy. Side by side with sanctions imposed on the aggressor, the heightened geopolitical tensions emphasized the importance of stabilizing the Western Balkans. The EU, now confronted with the urgency of these regional dynamics, adapted its enlargement strategy, promoting not just governance standards but a solidified approach to security and diplomacy.
In tandem with geopolitical factors, climate initiatives emerged as essential pillars of the EU’s identity. The ambitious 2025 climate target aimed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 90% by 2040. This commitment necessitated alignment with accepted environmental standards from all member states, including the newer entrants. The push for sustainability became intertwined with the enlargement process, representing a new frontier that characterizes the contemporary European narrative.
Simultaneously, the EU began to develop regulatory frameworks addressing the burgeoning field of digital health technologies. The rise of artificial intelligence necessitated harmonization across member states to ensure innovation kept pace with safety standards, further showcasing the EU’s evolving role as a protector of both progress and health.
Intriguingly, the journey toward energy independence also took center stage. The Baltic states' initiative to disconnect from the Russian-controlled BRELL power grid illustrated this transition, which was not without its own challenges. As Lithuania took the lead, Latvia and Estonia hesitated, casting light on the intricacies of negotiations within the EU. These internal discussions highlighted that, while united in purpose, the path to cohesion was often fraught with hesitation and negotiation.
Simultaneously, the European Semester emerged in response to the euro crisis of 2010, playing a crucial role in coordinating economic and fiscal policies among member states. This mechanism aimed to ensure compliance with EU rules, promoting stability. It illustrated how enlargement not only reshaped borders but also necessitated more stringent governance methods as newer members sought to align with the established norms.
Within health cooperation, the 2004 enlargement underscored the opportunities and challenges that arose. The need for coordinated pandemic preparedness and response efforts led to the establishment of the European Health Union. It was a delicate dance of strategy and solidarity, recognizing that health transcended borders.
The accession path of Poland in 2004 became a beacon for other countries aspiring to join. Its journey involved decades of painstaking reforms, setting a precedent. Poland's successful integration became a narrative filled with hope, a model for others navigating their paths toward EU membership amidst diverse political, economic, and social landscapes.
However, even in this aspirational fold, the EU grappled with cultural and political integration challenges. The expansions of the 1990s and 2000s tested the limits of the Union's ability to absorb diverse identities and political cultures. Debates on fundamental issues such as subsidiarity and sovereignty frequently surfaced, surfacing doubts about the EU's collective identity in a vast and varied landscape.
In a shifting global context, the impact of Brexit reverberated through the corridors of EU power. The departure of the UK created not just an economic and political shock but a renewed sense of urgency surrounding the cohesion and unity of the remaining members. The very fabric of European identity was being scrutinized, with every new member holding a mirror to both the aspirations and flaws of the Union.
Among these reflections, Ukraine stood resiliently at the forefront of integration efforts. Its pursuit of closer ties with the EU found footing in the 2014 Association Agreement and gained depth after the Russian invasion in 2022. The EU rallied around Ukraine, providing funding and support, but the road to full membership remained a distant goal. Ukraine's journey represented not merely a quest for EU membership but the embodiment of resilience in the face of adversity.
As countries vie for integration into the EU, the promise of membership serves as a potent incentive. This promise fuels reforms, igniting transformations in governance, rule of law, and economic policy in candidate countries. Yet, the progress is often uneven and slow, testing the patience of both candidates seeking to join and EU institutions tasked with guiding these nations.
As we reflect on these waves of expansion — from Sofia to Zagreb, and beyond — questions linger. What does it mean to be European? How do we weave together the diverse threads of culture, governance, and aspiration? The journey continues, marked by challenges and triumphs. With each new wave of integration, Europe inches closer toward an identity forged not through a singular narrative, but through the rich tapestry of its varied voices. In this voyage, we must ask ourselves: can we navigate the storms of our past to build a harmonious future? The answer lies not in the borders drawn on a map, but in the unity we cultivate in our shared humanity.
Highlights
- 2007: Bulgaria and Romania joined the European Union, marking a significant expansion into Southeastern Europe. Their accession required extensive reforms to tackle corruption, improve judicial systems, and secure borders, though both countries faced delays in joining the Schengen Area and adopting the euro currency.
- 2013: Croatia became the 28th member of the EU, the first country to join after the 2007 enlargement. Croatia's accession followed rigorous negotiations focusing on rule of law, anti-corruption measures, and border disputes, reflecting the EU’s increasing emphasis on governance standards for new members.
- 1991-2025: The EU’s enlargement policy evolved from primarily economic integration to a geopolitical tool, especially after Russia’s 2014 annexation of Crimea and the 2022 invasion of Ukraine, which accelerated the EU’s strategic interest in Western Balkan countries and Ukraine’s European aspirations.
- Post-2004: The "big bang" enlargement added 10 Central and Eastern European countries, increasing the EU’s population by 28% and surface area by 34%, reshaping the bloc’s geopolitical landscape and requiring new mechanisms for integration and cohesion.
- Transition Agreements on Free Movement: During Southern and Eastern expansions, the EU implemented transition agreements restricting labor market access for new members temporarily, balancing economic integration with concerns about migration pull factors. These restrictions were gradually lifted over years, culminating in full free movement rights for most new members by the 2010s.
- Schengen Area and Eurozone Integration: Bulgaria and Romania joined the EU in 2007 but have not yet fully joined the Schengen Area or adopted the euro, reflecting ongoing concerns about governance and economic convergence. Croatia joined Schengen in 2023 and adopted the euro in 2023, illustrating a staggered integration process for new members.
- Western Balkans Enlargement Queue: Countries like Serbia, Montenegro, North Macedonia, and Albania remain candidates or potential candidates, facing stringent conditions on rule of law, corruption, and normalization of relations with neighbors. The EU’s enlargement policy has become more conditional and politically complex since 2013.
- EU’s Geopolitical Shift Post-2014: The annexation of Crimea and the war in Ukraine led to 18 packages of EU sanctions against Russia by 2025, significantly impacting EU foreign policy and accelerating the strategic rationale for enlargement to stabilize the region.
- EU Climate Policy and Expansion: The EU’s 2025 climate target of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 90% by 2040 influences new member states’ policies, requiring alignment with EU environmental standards as part of accession and integration processes.
- Digital Health and Regulatory Innovation: Since the 2010s, the EU has developed complex regulatory frameworks for digital health technologies, including AI-enabled medical devices, reflecting the bloc’s role in harmonizing innovation and safety standards across member states, including new members.
Sources
- https://www.jmir.org/2025/1/e77982
- https://nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=73760
- https://socialworksreview.com/index.php/Journal/article/view/348
- https://www.athensjournals.gr/law/2025-11-4-4-Dumitriu.pdf
- http://journal-app.uzhnu.edu.ua/article/view/334210
- https://www.sipri.org/publications/2025/other-publications/women-multilateral-peace-operations-2025-what-state-play
- https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ps.70126
- https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/04353684.2025.2458905
- https://aacrjournals.org/cancerres/article/85/8_Supplement_1/1991/758510/Abstract-1991-Circulating-tumor-cells-migrate
- https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/14651165231202034