Select an episode
Not playing

Homes on Hold: The Housing Squeeze

Rents soar, commutes stretch, and adult kids boomerang home. Inside bidding wars, HAP paperwork, co-living pods, and student digs, we trace inequality’s map — from shiny build-to-rent blocks to emergency hotels — and the movements fighting for homes.

Episode Narrative

Homes on Hold: The Housing Squeeze

In the late 20th century, Ireland stood on the precipice of a crisis. The winds of change were beginning to howl. It was a time when hope mingled uneasily with uncertainty. From 1991 to 2025, the country faced a seismic shift in its housing landscape. This wasn't just an economic issue; it was a matter that touched the core of daily life. Soaring rents, extended commutes, and a troubling trend of adult children returning to live with their parents became part of the Irish narrative. What began as whispers soon turned into a cacophony, revealing a deep undercurrent of housing insecurity and rising inequality.

Dublin, once a city vibrant with opportunity, now echoed with the frustrations of its residents. Families, young professionals, and the elderly alike found themselves grappling with escalating costs that seemed insurmountable. The notion of home morphed into a distant dream for many, while some clung to the remnants of hope. The urbanization movement had collided with the stark reality of a housing sector that was unable to meet demand. A new word emerged to define this phenomenon — "boomeranging." Young adults, once eager to carve their paths, found themselves retracing steps back into their family homes, reflecting the shifting dynamics of Irish life.

Entering the 2010s, the landscape introduced a seemingly modern solution — "build-to-rent" developments. These new structures, glimmering under Dublin's sun, aimed to attract middle-income tenants. Yet, the reality was often grim. Just doors down, emergency accommodations proliferated, with families finding refuge in hotels. This sharp contrast exposed the growing gulf between those who could afford spiraling rents and those left behind, trapped in temporary housing.

As the years rolled on, from 2015 to 2025, the government initiated the Housing Assistance Payment, or HAP, to aid low-income households. On paper, it seemed like a lifeline. Yet, the reality was tangled in bureaucracy. Recipients faced complex paperwork that turned the promise of support into a source of daily frustration. Navigating these systems became a grueling task, intertwined with the harsh reality of waiting for help that often came too late.

For many, especially young adults and students, housing was not simply a matter of affordability; it was a race against time and space. The rise of co-living pods and shared student accommodations marked a new chapter in urban living. These shared spaces became solutions to soaring housing costs, creating a distinct subculture of communal living. Yet, such adaptations were born of necessity rather than choice, highlighting the squeeze that many felt in their search for stable, secure homes. The specter of economic instability loomed over these young lives, leaving them navigating an intricate balance of independence and reliance.

Between 2016 and 2023, the pressure intensified. Bidding wars erupted for rental properties in major cities. Average rents in Dublin surged by over 50%, forcing countless individuals to seek refuge in distant suburbs. The daily commute morphed into a test of endurance, with many now spending over 40 minutes traveling to work. What should have been a simple journey instead became a frustration, both physically and mentally. This relentless cycle of longer hours on the road encroached upon family time, personal lives, and mental health. The struggle to secure a home steadily chipped away at the fabric of community life.

Then came the global eruption of the COVID-19 pandemic — a storm that magnified vulnerabilities. The lockdowns forced many into a brave new world of remote work, reshaping commuting patterns in ways that were previously unimaginable. But the pandemic also precipitated a seismic increase in the demand for stable housing amidst rising economic hardship. Emergency accommodations were flooded with requests as families found themselves without a safety net. The walls that once enclosed homes crumbled under the weight of uncertainty, leaving many wondering what tomorrow might bring.

During this turbulent period, grassroots movements gained momentum. Groups like "Raise the Roof" and "Threshold" emerged, galvanizing public sentiment and fighting for tenants' rights, rent controls, and enhanced social housing investments. Their voices echoed across cities and towns, demanding that the government confront the escalating crisis head-on. The call for change resonated deeply within communities — an urgent plea for recognition of the systemic inequalities that plagued the housing sector. Hope emerged from despair, as citizens united around the idea that everyone deserved a place to call home.

Yet, the government struggled to keep pace with the demands of a burgeoning population. The National Planning Framework set ambitious goals of constructing 33,000 new homes annually by 2020. However, the vision clashed violently with the stark reality. Supply failed to meet soaring demand, and the squeeze only tightened. As ambitions faltered, frustration bubbled beneath the surface.

As new housing options emerged, some narratives unfolded with more shadows than light. The allure of platforms like Airbnb contributed to the decline in long-term rentals. As tourists filled properties that once housed residents, communities became fragmented. Cultural cohesion eroded amidst rising rents and fewer available homes, leaving many to question the very essence of what it meant to belong.

Through the years, the struggles of young adults became increasingly apparent. By 2023, data revealed that over 20% of individuals aged 25 to 34 were living with their parents, a stark shift from previous decades. It was a generational shift — one shaped by the pressing realities of unaffordable housing. The traditional family structure was undergoing a transformation, now emblematically defined by cohabitation as a necessity rather than a choice.

Universities, once heralded as bastions of learning, were now facing student accommodation shortages. Overcrowded and substandard living conditions plagued many university towns, prompting urgent calls for investment in purpose-built housing. The next generation's dreams were at stake, caught in a web of inadequate resources and skyrocketing prices.

As these socio-economic tides ebbed and flowed, energy and transport poverty emerged as additional burdens. Low-income households grappled not only with soaring rent but also with heating costs and lengthy commutes, creating a perfect storm of daily life challenges. Every decision — a choice between paying rent or keeping the lights on — became a bitter reminder of an unresolved crisis.

Navigating the housing landscape became a complex dance of technology and bureaucracy. Many turned to digital platforms in their search for homes, but these tools were often accompanied by frustrations stemming from opaque processes and bureaucratic delays. The human experience of seeking a home was becoming increasingly digitalized — but in a way that left many feeling more isolated than ever.

Meanwhile, families facing homelessness found their lives upended as they sought refuge in emergency accommodations. Often, these accommodations meant long stays in hotels, stripping away any semblance of routine. Children lost the consistency of home life, disrupted schooling, and a sense of stability. The emotional toll was incalculable, resonating far beyond the four walls of temporary living spaces.

The acceptance of multi-generational living arrangements became a beacon of resilience amid the chaos. Families adapted, turning necessity into a viable solution, highlighting a cultural shift within the Irish ethos. Yet, while many found ways to navigate the challenge, the impacts of housing insecurity continued to loom large over the broader society.

The rental sector continued to grow, overtaking home ownership for many. By 2025, over 30% of households were renting, an unprecedented shift from earlier decades. This revolution in living arrangements altered community dynamics, influencing daily life patterns and reshaping the very notion of family and belonging.

As the years progressed, visual data began to emerge, illustrating the reality of the housing squeeze. Maps of soaring rents painted a vivid picture of geographical disparities, while charts depicting average commute times revealed the urban struggles that so many faced. These visualizations captured the narrative of a nation in distress, amplifying stories that demanded to be told.

And through it all, the most vulnerable groups bore the brunt of the crisis — low-income families, migrants, and young professionals. As inequality deepened, daily life stressors compounded, sowing seeds of despair amidst a landscape of uncertainty.

Ireland's housing crisis cast a long shadow, intertwining the destinies of countless individuals. It exemplified a struggle that reached beyond economic metrics, touching the fundamental human desire for security and belonging. In reflecting upon these tumultuous years, one must ask, how do we navigate the path forward? As we hold the remnants of hope within our grasp, we are reminded that each brick, each family reunited, and each successful campaign for change contributes to the unfolding story of our nation. What will the future hold, as we stand on the brink of a new dawn?

Highlights

  • 1991-2025: Ireland experienced a significant housing crisis characterized by soaring rents, extended commutes, and a rise in adult children returning to live with parents ("boomeranging"), reflecting growing housing insecurity and inequality.
  • 2010s-2020s: The emergence of "build-to-rent" developments introduced shiny new rental blocks aimed at middle-income tenants, contrasting sharply with the proliferation of emergency accommodation such as hotels for homeless families, highlighting stark housing disparities.
  • 2015-2025: Housing Assistance Payment (HAP) schemes expanded, providing rent subsidies to low-income households but also involving complex paperwork and administrative challenges that affected daily life for recipients.
  • 2020-2025: Co-living pods and shared student accommodation became more common in urban centers like Dublin, reflecting adaptations to high housing costs and limited availability, especially among young adults and students.
  • 2016-2025: Bidding wars for rental properties intensified in major cities, with average rents increasing by over 50% in Dublin between 2016 and 2023, pushing many to seek housing further from workplaces and lengthening daily commutes.
  • 2020-2025: The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated housing pressures, with lockdowns and remote work altering commuting patterns but also increasing demand for stable housing, while emergency accommodation needs surged due to economic hardship.
  • 2019-2025: Movements and campaigns such as "Raise the Roof" and "Threshold" gained prominence, advocating for tenants' rights, rent controls, and increased social housing investment to combat inequality in housing access.
  • 2010-2025: The Irish government’s National Planning Framework aimed to increase housing supply, targeting 33,000 new homes annually by 2020, but supply consistently lagged behind demand, contributing to the squeeze on daily life.
  • 2015-2025: The average commute time in Dublin increased from approximately 30 minutes to over 40 minutes, as workers moved to more affordable housing in suburbs and commuter towns, impacting daily routines and quality of life.
  • 2018-2025: The rise of short-term rental platforms like Airbnb reduced long-term rental stock in urban areas, further tightening the housing market and inflating rents, affecting cultural and community cohesion.

Sources

  1. https://www.peterlang.com/document/1493256
  2. https://www.onlinescientificresearch.com/articles/assessing-symptom-severity-and-quality-of-life-implications-in--women-of-reproductive-age-with-uterine-fibroids-and-related--condi.pdf
  3. https://www.cureus.com/articles/394105-comparison-of-transperitoneal-vs-retroperitoneal-laparoscopic-donor-nephrectomy-impact-on-quality-of-life-and-complications
  4. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1682921/full
  5. https://bmjopen.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099447
  6. https://bmjopen.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-093079
  7. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/14651858.CD016192.pub2
  8. https://www.dovepress.com/analysis-of-acupoint-selection-and-combinations-in-acupuncture-treat-4-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-JPR
  9. http://medrxiv.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/2025.09.09.25335451
  10. https://bmcnurs.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12912-025-03787-2